lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([tww] everyone sucks but me)
What's the opposite of a bulletproof narrative kink? Whatever that is, I have settled on my ultimate one.

I hatehatehatehatehatehate when Character A does something that Character B misinterprets. But there is a totally logical and reasonable explanation for what Character A did that if Character B just knew about it, would totally be okay with. But Character A doesn't explain, and so Character B feels betrayed/angry/whatever.

Now, there are very rare occasions when Character A has some actual reason when s/he can't explain--sometimes because of a promise or honor or very, very, very rarely because Character A is so timid or whatever that s/he can't work up the courage to.

But 90% of the time, the only reason Character A doesn't just explain what happened is because the narrative wants to prolong the angst and misunderstanding. And I hate this not only because it's hella annoying but because it privileges plot over characterization, which is something I can't stand. Good plot arises from the actions of the characters, actions that are consistent with who those characters are. Plot that overwhelms characters or demands that characters act a certain way...I have no interest in those kinds of stories. The best stories have excellent plot and characters, but I'll take characterization over plot any day.

Ugh. Why do fictional characters never just talk to each other? It's so unrealistic to me. Communication is the key to good relationships, and it's far more interesting to me to have characters who actually tell the truth to each other and then have conflict because they want different things or something than it is to see them misunderstanding each other at every turn. Ugh.

This post brought to you by romantic comedy kdramas: best OTPs, worst plotting.
lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([tww] everyone sucks but me)
What's the opposite of a bulletproof narrative kink? Whatever that is, I have settled on my ultimate one.

I hatehatehatehatehatehate when Character A does something that Character B misinterprets. But there is a totally logical and reasonable explanation for what Character A did that if Character B just knew about it, would totally be okay with. But Character A doesn't explain, and so Character B feels betrayed/angry/whatever.

Now, there are very rare occasions when Character A has some actual reason when s/he can't explain--sometimes because of a promise or honor or very, very, very rarely because Character A is so timid or whatever that s/he can't work up the courage to.

But 90% of the time, the only reason Character A doesn't just explain what happened is because the narrative wants to prolong the angst and misunderstanding. And I hate this not only because it's hella annoying but because it privileges plot over characterization, which is something I can't stand. Good plot arises from the actions of the characters, actions that are consistent with who those characters are. Plot that overwhelms characters or demands that characters act a certain way...I have no interest in those kinds of stories. The best stories have excellent plot and characters, but I'll take characterization over plot any day.

Ugh. Why do fictional characters never just talk to each other? It's so unrealistic to me. Communication is the key to good relationships, and it's far more interesting to me to have characters who actually tell the truth to each other and then have conflict because they want different things or something than it is to see them misunderstanding each other at every turn. Ugh.

This post brought to you by romantic comedy kdramas: best OTPs, worst plotting.
lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([tww] everyone sucks but me)
What's the opposite of a bulletproof narrative kink? Whatever that is, I have settled on my ultimate one.

I hatehatehatehatehatehate when Character A does something that Character B misinterprets. But there is a totally logical and reasonable explanation for what Character A did that if Character B just knew about it, would totally be okay with. But Character A doesn't explain, and so Character B feels betrayed/angry/whatever.

Now, there are very rare occasions when Character A has some actual reason when s/he can't explain--sometimes because of a promise or honor or very, very, very rarely because Character A is so timid or whatever that s/he can't work up the courage to.

But 90% of the time, the only reason Character A doesn't just explain what happened is because the narrative wants to prolong the angst and misunderstanding. And I hate this not only because it's hella annoying but because it privileges plot over characterization, which is something I can't stand. Good plot arises from the actions of the characters, actions that are consistent with who those characters are. Plot that overwhelms characters or demands that characters act a certain way...I have no interest in those kinds of stories. The best stories have excellent plot and characters, but I'll take characterization over plot any day.

Ugh. Why do fictional characters never just talk to each other? It's so unrealistic to me. Communication is the key to good relationships, and it's far more interesting to me to have characters who actually tell the truth to each other and then have conflict because they want different things or something than it is to see them misunderstanding each other at every turn. Ugh.

This post brought to you by romantic comedy kdramas: best OTPs, worst plotting.
lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([tgw] i'm private)
When Person A wants Person B to do something and Person B refuses. So Person A says something like, "Well, you must just be scared then," or "Oh, that means you can't do it" or something, and Person B immediately gets so offended that he or she must do this thing and prove Person A wrong WRONG WRONG DAMMIT!!!

Uh, would that work on y'all? Because that would totally not work on me. Maybe it's just because I'm, like, the least competative person in the world, but I would roll my eyes if someone tried to emotionally blackmail me in this way. But maybe that's just me? Maybe this isn't just a lazy trope and other people would actually fall for this sort of thing? I don't know. Any thoughts? Because this BUGS me. It's a trope that I want to see die forever unless the people in question live in an honor-based society where it actually makes sense for them to behave this way (dueling pistols at sunrise! That sort of thing) or if the character in question has been canonically established as hyper-competative.

Apparently my newfound commitment to posting here means that y'all will be on the receiving end of every single thought that pops into my head, no matter how inconsequential. Lucky you!
lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([tgw] i'm private)
When Person A wants Person B to do something and Person B refuses. So Person A says something like, "Well, you must just be scared then," or "Oh, that means you can't do it" or something, and Person B immediately gets so offended that he or she must do this thing and prove Person A wrong WRONG WRONG DAMMIT!!!

Uh, would that work on y'all? Because that would totally not work on me. Maybe it's just because I'm, like, the least competative person in the world, but I would roll my eyes if someone tried to emotionally blackmail me in this way. But maybe that's just me? Maybe this isn't just a lazy trope and other people would actually fall for this sort of thing? I don't know. Any thoughts? Because this BUGS me. It's a trope that I want to see die forever unless the people in question live in an honor-based society where it actually makes sense for them to behave this way (dueling pistols at sunrise! That sort of thing) or if the character in question has been canonically established as hyper-competative.

Apparently my newfound commitment to posting here means that y'all will be on the receiving end of every single thought that pops into my head, no matter how inconsequential. Lucky you!
lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([tgw] i'm private)
When Person A wants Person B to do something and Person B refuses. So Person A says something like, "Well, you must just be scared then," or "Oh, that means you can't do it" or something, and Person B immediately gets so offended that he or she must do this thing and prove Person A wrong WRONG WRONG DAMMIT!!!

Uh, would that work on y'all? Because that would totally not work on me. Maybe it's just because I'm, like, the least competative person in the world, but I would roll my eyes if someone tried to emotionally blackmail me in this way. But maybe that's just me? Maybe this isn't just a lazy trope and other people would actually fall for this sort of thing? I don't know. Any thoughts? Because this BUGS me. It's a trope that I want to see die forever unless the people in question live in an honor-based society where it actually makes sense for them to behave this way (dueling pistols at sunrise! That sort of thing) or if the character in question has been canonically established as hyper-competative.

Apparently my newfound commitment to posting here means that y'all will be on the receiving end of every single thought that pops into my head, no matter how inconsequential. Lucky you!

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 56 78910
11 1213 14 151617
1819 20 21222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 08:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios