Entry tags:
because what else am i going to do while at work?
A random comment by
mollivanders gave me an idea for a meme:
Give me a text (book, TV show, movie, etc.) and I will tell you what I would have done differently if I had written it. Not little details, necessarily, but big plot or theme or characterization choices.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Give me a text (book, TV show, movie, etc.) and I will tell you what I would have done differently if I had written it. Not little details, necessarily, but big plot or theme or characterization choices.
no subject
no subject
First of all, I would have told the story of the first war, and I would have focused on the Black sisters. Probably with Andromeda as the main character, but using the three of them to explore everything that happened during that war.
But if I had chosen to tell the story of the second war, I would have had Hermione be the main character because, as
And finally, if I had written them with Harry as the main character, the books after OoTP (which I love) would have been about THE ACTUAL WAR instead of high school love triangles and camping. Like, the Order of the Phoenix would have been fighting and smuggling muggle-borns to safety and such. I wanted a war narrative, and I didn't get it. *wistful sigh*
no subject
And sometimes I think 'oh well that's what fanfic is for' but then I go look and all I find is Harry/Draco porn. You gotta love fandom's priorities sometimes :P
no subject
And sometimes I think 'oh well that's what fanfic is for' but then I go look and all I find is Harry/Draco porn. You gotta love fandom's priorities sometimes :P
You make me laugh and cry at the same time.
no subject
no subject
(I would pay someone else to write it for me. Someone talented.)
no subject
no subject
I would have had the text deal more explicitly with Katniss's feelings re: Peeta and the line between pretend and reality. I would have had Peeta taken and brainwashed in the second book so we could actually DEAL WITH THIS in the third and see why these two would fall in love. Also, I would not have had Katniss have kids.
The Quarter Quell didn't really need to happen? Book 2, other than introducing great new characters--I love Finnick! I love you Johanna!-- was kind of worthless to the overall plot? Like, I would have expanded the war into two books instead of trying to fit it in one. (I always want a war narrative. I am predictible.)
FIX THE PACING IN THE LAST BOOK.
CINNA AND FINNICK MY BABIES DON'T LEAVE ME. I don't know if I could have killed them off, seeing how much I love them.
Those are just the first ones that come to mind.
no subject
I really wanted to love Katniss/Peeta more! But my reaction to them in the last book was: "oh okay. Them together? That's…good, I guess?" Just…tepid. Once read someone describe this ship as very situational, and I think that's what niggles at me. Whenever they're in the arena saving each other left and right, when they plain CAN'T LOSE each other, I get it. In the quiet moments, in the dust-settling-down moments? Not so much.
And bam, that’s what hit me at the end of Mockingjay: how are these two going to get on after the end of the war? I feel almost sad, thinking of them left with each other.
I enjoyed the Quell because of the pacing and because I find the politics of the Victors absolutely fascinating…but you are right, what did it do? Panem was already stirred up; Katniss and Peeta and the rebels could’ve gone straight to business, really. Oh how I wanted to see Peeta actually using that famous charisma to lead. And more Mockingjay action from Katniss, please! Would not have said no to two books of her kicking ass and taking names around Panem.
CINNA AND FINNICK MY BABIES DON'T LEAVE ME.
:( I do not know what was worse…watching Finnick die like that or Cinna just gone like that.
no subject
Yeah, me, too. I didn't believe it. I've read some good fic, but other than that....I definitely don't ship Katniss/Gale, so I was kinda Katniss/Peeta by default, but the more I think about it, the less satisfied I am with the execution of it.
Whenever they're in the arena saving each other left and right, when they plain CAN'T LOSE each other, I get it. In the quiet moments, in the dust-settling-down moments? Not so much.
And bam, that’s what hit me at the end of Mockingjay: how are these two going to get on after the end of the war? I feel almost sad, thinking of them left with each other.
OMG YES YES YES YES YES to all of your thoughts. Yes.
because of the pacing and because I find the politics of the Victors absolutely fascinating
Agreed there, though I think the politics of the Victors could be explored in a different context that had more to do with the plot.
Oh how I wanted to see Peeta actually using that famous charisma to lead. And more Mockingjay action from Katniss, please! Would not have said no to two books of her kicking ass and taking names around Panem.
ABSOLUTELY.
:( I do not know what was worse…watching Finnick die like that or Cinna just gone like that.
I am weeping.
no subject
Oh I may as well ask - The Hunger Games?Okay, never mind. What about a Jane Austen novel of your choice?
no subject
It's been a long time since I've read any Austen except Emma (which I would change just about nothing about, as sometimes uncomfortable as it makes me), like high school long. So I'll focus on screenplays instead, okay?
What I hate most about the screenplays and the public's perceptions of these stories is that so many of them treat them as straight-up romance where the conflict arises from whether the leads will get together. Whereas in most of her books (Emma aside), the conflict is IF I DON'T GET MARRIED MY FAMILY WILL STARVE. Like, actually be poor. Sure, it's great that the ladies end up with guys they love. But there's some dark undercurrents in these books, that looming poverty lurking in the future, the constant awareness that these women have no control over their lives, have no options. It's heartbreaking. And I feel like so often people gloss over that and treat them just like a lighthearted romantic romp.
no subject
This is actually my favorite thing about the Keira Knightly P & P--the scene where Charlotte gives Lizzie what-for about being terrified about being a burden on her parents--about this being her last chance to get married and therefore fulfill her only chance to be considered anything but an utter failure. SO DON'T JUDGE, LIZZIE.
That version fails in plenty of ways, but I really do think it succeeds in capturing the stress around finances and marriage for women. Other versions tend to leave you with the impression that the girls/mother are money-grubbing, looking for wealthy husbands. They don't make it clear that they will all starve when the father dies if the girls don't get married.
no subject
SERIOUSLY. The fact that these women have no other options forces them to view marriage as a mercenary thing.
no subject
no subject
I also would have kept Eric on, or at least not introduced Randy, but I guess that was out of the writers' hands.
As for SPN, uuuugh, I would kill off more men and less ladies and make the lady-killing filmed less sexually? I would have brought Jo and Ellen and Ash and the Roadhouse on as a constant element. I wouldn't have necessarily had Jo get romantically involved with either of the boys, but I think having a spunky little sister figure could have been fantastic. And having Ellen and Bobby BOTH looking out for the boys would have created an extra bit of security for them. The boys could make stops at the Roadhouse between jobs and we could have had a sort of home-base for them. I like the roadtrip elements of the first season, but I feel like once the show started to create an actual mytharc, they no longer needed to have just two (and then later three with Cas) constant characters.
I also would not have killed Bela off for no good reason. NO GOOD REASON.
no subject
no subject
I would not have had the retcon with the whole "Cassidy's actually the one who raped her!" thing. I'm fine with him blowing up the bus (well, not fine, but you know), but that whole bit was TOO FAR. I mean, the whole rape thing was suspect from the start (and I wouldn't have had it in to begin with), but that just made it seem so lazy. As we all know, I would have had way more interaction between Cassidy and Kendall and have them trying to take over the world together while hating each other. And more Logan and Weevil scenes, since they're more alike than they'll admit and should be interacting more. I also think the Wallace-gets-in-trouble plotline in S2 is weird? I would have come up with a way better plot for him and let him have more screentime and development.
And what even is S3, I don't even know, I can't even touch that.
no subject
no subject
Rilla is almost flawless, but I would probably have more of Ken so that we could really get to know him.
I also could have used more Gilbert interaction in Anne of the Island.
I would have written more about Anne trying to keep up with her college friends--Phil and Stella and Priscilla--in later books. And Diana of course.
But other than that, nothing is really coming to mind!
no subject
Maybe more Marilla, and how Anne's perception of her changes as Anne matures and has children.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
1) No Sketch. That plotline was gross.
2) I wouldn't have Cassie be gone for so long in S2. Because I feel like I never got to see her and Sid together, so I didn't entirely believe that they were really in love in love? Like, everyone's talking about how they're in love, but I didn't get to see that much. So I would have seen that more.
UGH GEN 3 I DON'T KNOW HOW TO TALK ABOUT THIS.
There are loads of things I would do differently but all I care about at this point is my Gracie-girl being alive and happy with Rich.
And I probably would have had them actually get married.Ugh, I can't think about this anymore.no subject
Gen 3. Yeah. I hear nothing but badness. Though apparently the Liv episode is good. I'm not sure if I care enough to see for myself tbh.