lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([btvs] just the three of us)
lirazel ([personal profile] lirazel) wrote2010-03-29 08:01 pm

Watch me be really passionate! About things that matter and things that don't! In that order!

- I'm embroiled in a rather vicious facebook conversation right now with a friend of mine. I mentioned that I was boycotting the Avatar: the Last Airbender movie because of race!fail, and he said he thought "the whole race thing" was blown out of proportion and went on to say a bunch of really privileged things that made me headdesk forever. I then sent him a looooong, ranty, link-filled message ripping apart each one of his points and generally being furious.

I shouldn't be surprised, though. This guy is such a Nice Guy (TM); he's actually the one I invented the phrase Bitter Beta Male Syndrome about. Most of the time when I'm having a conversation with him, I just want to yell, "CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE, JACKASS!" Unfortunately, he's the only person in RL who's into all the shows I'm into, so we still talk. I might have to friend break-up with him, but I'm hoping not.

Oh, people. Why do you fail so hard?

- Apropos of nothing, I'm going to tell y'all the top ten reasons I think Buffy/Angel would never work! Aren't you excited? I know you are!


This is not well-constructed meta or even particularly insightful ramblings. It's just thoughts. And they're not overly thinky. Some of the phrasing/ideas may have actually been stolen from other people unknowingly (tell me! I'll credit!). Mostly, it's just me being self-indulgent.

Basically what it boils down to is that they're too much alike in all the wrong ways and not alike enough in all of the right ones.

1. The whole "I Will Remember You" thing. There are actually two things I hate about this episode: A) Angel's gotta protect Buffy (gag me with a spoon), and B) The memory-wipe. Yeah, my feelings on memory alteration are along the lines of [livejournal.com profile] green_maia's: it's absolutely a violation of the most profound kind and there are very few things on earth worse. The fact that he does it in order to "protect" Buffy is just the most patronizing thing ever. It makes me gnash my teeth with anger.

(I'm much more willing to forgive Angel for something similar at the end of S4 of AtS, perhaps because I tend to cut people a little bit of slack when they're doing things for their children. It's still wrong, but I'd be willing to forgive him for it. I'm a hypocrite. With a great affection for Connor. Sue me.)

That episode is just the death-knell for these two, in my opinion. I could never get behind it after that, and I don't think we're meant to.

2. They both tend toward depression and taking themselves too seriously. Remember when they were together? Remember how they sat around angsting and proclaiming their love? Sure, that makes for good TV (I guess. Other people seem to like it, even if it bores me out of my mind). And it's very true to the feelings you experience with your first high school love (I guess. People say that. I never had one myself, and I don't feel like I was missing out on anything). But for an actual relationship? Where's the joy?

Angel and Buffy both need someone who won't take them seriously, who'll tease them out of a funk, who'll basically tell them they're being mopey and they should get over it. This is why Buffy and Spike work--Spike has that zest for life and that habit of seeing right through the others' crap and calling them on it. This is also why I think that Angel and Cordy could have worked, if they'd been written right, and why I even could see Angel and Faith together. But Angel's true love forever is Darla! DARLA DARLA DARLA!

And as a corollary to that....

3. "When you kiss me, I want to die" is not a healthy sentiment. Actually, it's pretty much exactly like something I'd expect Bella Swan to say. Or Edward. *gag*

4. They're both Alphas, and neither one of them is willing to ride shotgun. Buffy is the hero on her show. Angel is the hero on his show. (Even if I have loads of problems with the supposedly "heroic" decisions he makes.) The entire reason Angel left Buffy's show is because he couldn't be the hero unless he had his own.

They're both leaders. They call the shots. It's what they do. When Angel was still on BtVS they made this work by Angel basically on dropping in now and then to say cryptic things and then going off and doing his own thing. Brooding and gelling his hair, presumably. But if they came together again and really tried to make it work, it wouldn't.

Who calls the shots when there's two heroes in the room? If Buffy's judgment is telling her to do one thing and Angel's is telling him to do another, whose judgment do they trust? On the shows, the answer was easy: whoever's name is in the title. But in the real world? They'd end up clashing and probably resenting each other.

Let's face it: Angel is a self-righteous ass likes to make decisions for people. He does it all the time. He says, "It's for their own good!" or "It's the only way!" He's all about lesser of two evils. Whereas Buffy sees two evil options, decides neither one is good enough, and then creates a third option that lets her win the day. (One of the many, many things I love about her.) Plus, she makes her own decisions. She's a grownup now, not a love-struck school girl. A few weeks of Angel trying to decide what's best for her, and she'd kick him to the curb. Trust.

That's one of the things I've always loved about Spike: he is so totally willing to ride shotgun. He's got Buffy's back, and he's willing to be her lieutenant, and he's okay with that. Spike's a beta, but at least he's man enough to admit it. That makes him really great for Buffy: he's willing to be the mission's boyfriend. Of course, he loves the mission, too, post-soul, and I don't think it's healthy for him to entirely live for Buffy, nor would I want him to. But he's okay with being her right-hand man. And that makes them fit.

5. What would they talk about? Seriously! This one may be petty, but let's face it: Angel's a stick-in-the-mud. He likes Barry Manilow. Actually, I love that he likes Barry Manilow, as this affection provides many of my favorite moments on AtS. OMG ANGEL AND CONNOR SINGING TO JASMINE?????? GREATEST. THING. EVER!!!!

But I really just don't know what they actually have in common. Angel likes hockey? I think? Hockey and Barry Manilow. And what else? I don't even know. He just radiates this feeling of age to me (not that that's a bad thing, but it is when you're trying to be with Buffy), of out-of-touchness.

Spike, on the other hand, obviously loves to live in the moment. You know he watches copious amounts of bad television. I like to imagine him and Dawn watching America's Next Top Model and snarking along. He may protest, but you know he knows every single one of the names of the New Kids on the Block. (That was before my time, but who do y'all think Buffy had a crush on? Share!) Spike would watch badly-dubbed Korean movies with Buffy and snark right along. He's as dedicated to Dawn as Buffy is, and he has a relationship with her. I can so easily see him and Buffy arguing over what movie to go see or what to listen to on the radio, and Spike would keep up with her. Plus: banter banter banter! That's my favorite thing in a fictional relationship!

Question: has anybody ever written fic where Buffy takes Spike ice skating? Because I want to read about him being grumpy and muttering about how it's poncey. That would be EPIC.

6. They regress when they're around each other. Incidentally, Spike and Angel also regress when they're around each other, but in a delightfully snarky brothers-picking-at-each-other sort of way that makes me giggle forever. Buffy and Angel just do it in the bad way.

When Angel shows up on Buffy, he regresses to being Buffy's (ex)boyfriend. When Buffy shows up on AtS, she regresses to being a nagging (ex)girlfriend. This is not flattering for either of them, and I hate them both when they're on each others' shows (which is saying something, because we all know how I feel about Buffy).

7. They don't even know each other anymore. Others *coughscottallie* may argue, but I think it's pretty safe to say that Connor is the most important thing in Angel's life. And I think it's safe to say that Buffy went through the most dramatic changes of her life between seasons 5-7.

And they weren't in each others' lives during those times. They missed out on the huge, informative moments--Angel finding out about the Shanshu, being tempted by Darla during S2, gaining then losing Connor then watching the world fall apart, then selling his soul to take over an evil law firm; Buffy losing her mom, finding her sister, sacrificing her life, being resurrected, struggling with clinical depression, finding the will to live again, the AR with Spike, forgiving him, being so alone, sharing her power.

Buffy at the end of S7 is not Buffy at the end of S3. Angel at the end of AtS S5 is not who he was when he left Sunnydale. They're so, so different. I think a really talented writer could probably show them getting to know each other again, but I feel like they'd disappoint each other. Buffy isn't the innocent, full-of-life girl Angel was so captivated by: she's a war-hardened general. Angel isn't the shining knight she thought he was; he's a man who made a lot of moral compromises and whose best qualities are all wrapped up in his fatherhood. All of the things that them fall for each other in the first place have been broken and beaten over the years. If they met now, would they be so taken with each other? I suspect not.

I know they'll always be important to each other. Too important, honestly: I really think what she went through with Angel really messed Buffy up emotionally. But they aren't at the same place. And I doubt they ever will be again.

8. TWILIGHT IS EEEEEVIL!!!!!

9. Buffy and Spike have better sex. THEY DESTROYED A BUILDING. THE END. This one is for you, [livejournal.com profile] ohwahluvusbab!

10. Buffy loves Spike. Cookie dough: code word for brush-off.

Yeah, I got petty there at the end. Sue me.

And now I'm going to be quiet.

[identity profile] eilowyn.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
This is one of the times I wish I could be really eloquent and have copious amounts of comments for you, but the reality just boils down to one thing: WORD. Super major double-helix WORD.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
This comment completely works for me! I'm grinning very wide!

OF COURSE YOU KNOW THIS MEANS WAR

[identity profile] madcap-shiny.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
ASDFJKJL;;;;; HOW COULD YOU

YOU ARE BEING SO MEAN TO MY OTP
SO
MEAN
*DEFRIENDS YOU*
*REFRIENDS YOU TO DEFRIEND YOU AGAIN*

And oh, you want rejection? I'll give you rejection: "I love you." "No, you don't, but thanks for saying it." SO THERE.

*sticks out tongue and burrows into sand and NEVER SPEAKS TO YOU AGAIN*

/wank!

Re: OF COURSE YOU KNOW THIS MEANS WAR

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
THIS WAS PART OF MY PLAN TO MAKE YOU AAAAAAAAAAAAANGRY!

BECAUSE YOUR OTP IS THE SUCKIEST OTP EVVVVVVVVVVVVER!

AND I'll DEFRIEND FRIEND AGAIN DEFRIEND FRIEND AGAIN MORE THAN YOU!

/wank!
molly_may: (Never Leave Me  S/B - amyxaphania)

[personal profile] molly_may 2010-03-30 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
The fact that he does it in order to "protect" Buffy is just the most patronizing thing ever. It makes me gnash my teeth with anger.

And the joke's on Angel, because Buffy dies a year and a half later anyway! Great job protecting her there, big guy.

That makes him really great for Buffy: he's willing to be the mission's boyfriend. Of course, he loves the mission, too, post-soul, and I don't think it's healthy for him to entirely live for Buffy, not would I want him to. But he's okay with being her right-hand man. And that makes them fit.

I agree with this, but I guess one of my unpopular Spike opinions is that I don't really care what's "healthy" for him; I LOVE that he lives for Buffy. I think that's part of what makes him such an enduring and popular character, his devotion to the woman he loves. The loss of that, to me, is a big part of why he doesn't work as well in S5 of Angel (and it's apparently been completely abandoned in the comics). I want Spike post-soul, doing the right thing for the right reasons, but screw healthy, I want him living for Buffy too.

To your entire list, all I can really say is AMEN.




[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:36 am (UTC)(link)

And the joke's on Angel, because Buffy dies a year and a half later anyway! Great job protecting her there, big guy.
Hahaha! Yeah!

Actually, I guess I meant that I want to see him have a few more relationships--with Dawn, for instance. I love him with Dawn. In S7, though, it feels like it's just him and Buffy, and I want him to have other people who love him, too!

But yeah, I agree he loses a lot of his way when he doesn't have Buffy around. He does totally need her to ground him.
deird1: Fred looking pretty and thoughful (Katara)

[personal profile] deird1 2010-03-30 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
So, apparently I agree with you about everything ever.

Especially these:

But Angel's true love forever is Darla! DARLA DARLA DARLA!

That makes him really great for Buffy: he's willing to be the mission's boyfriend.

Plus: banter banter banter! That's my favorite thing in a fictional relationship!

Spike and Angel also regress when they're around each other, but in a delightfully snarky brothers-picking-at-each-other sort of way that makes me giggle forever.

THEY DESTROYED A BUILDING. THE END.




Do we get to see the looooong, ranty, link-filled message?

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
Yay! Agreement about everything ever!

I am so pleased!

And I'm going to repeat: DARLA DARLA DARLA!

Considering that I think I might have just hit the end of my friendship with this guy, it might be important to document here. So yeah, maybe I'll copy/paste the whole thing tomorrow. I'm too emotionally exhausted tonight.

LOVE YOUR ICON!
next_to_normal: (Take that Angel)

[personal profile] next_to_normal 2010-03-30 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
I'm much more willing to figure Angel for something similar at the end of S4 of AtS, perhaps because I tend to cut people a little bit of slack when they're doing things for their children. It's still wrong, but I'd be willing to forgive him for it. I'm a hypocrite. With a great affection for Connor. Sue me.

Heh, it's okay, I do the same thing. Although, I cut Angel more slack for both mindwipes than I do Willow, because she deliberately sets out to wipe people's minds to make things easier for herself. With Angel, it's more like - he wants something (to be a vampire again; to save Connor) and the price of getting that is the mindwipe. For Willow, it's not a price, it's a hat trick. That makes a difference to me.

But Angel's true love forever is Darla! DARLA DARLA DARLA!

WORD.

OMG ANGEL AND CONNOR SINGING TO JASMINE?????? GREATEST. THING. EVER!!!!

WORD!!!

Oh, and yep to pretty much all the serious stuff, too.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:42 am (UTC)(link)

Heh, it's okay, I do the same thing. Although, I cut Angel more slack for both mindwipes than I do Willow, because she deliberately sets out to wipe people's minds to make things easier for herself. With Angel, it's more like - he wants something (to be a vampire again; to save Connor) and the price of getting that is the mindwipe. For Willow, it's not a price, it's a hat trick. That makes a difference to me.


Yes, this is it exactly. I totally agree.

I am loving the Darla/Angel(us) love in this post! It fills me with glee!

[identity profile] beloved-77.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
a bunch of really privileged things that made me headdesk forever

I have a friend who knew this guy in school who went on and on about how he was oppressed. His parents were wealthy, he was getting his Masters degree from one of the most prestigious universities in the country, and he drove a BMW. Some people have no perspective. :-P

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously, I just called this guy on his privilege, and his response was something along the lines of, "Be careful with the phrase 'privileged white male' [except that he misspelled "privileged!"]. It has dangerous implications."

To which I said, "Dangerous implications? What does that even mean?"

I think I'll be preserving the entire discussion in my journal at some point.

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
I'm embroiled in a rather vicious facebook conversation right now with a friend of mine. I mentioned that I was boycotting the Avatar: the Last Airbender movie because of race!fail, and he said he thought "the whole race thing" was blown out of proportion and went on to say a bunch of really privileged things that made me headdesk forever. I then sent him a looooong, ranty, link-filled message ripping apart each one of his points and generally being furious.

LET ME AT HIM.


ALSO OKAY BUFFY/ANGEL RANT YAY!

6 + 7 are my favorites. because i have realized some very important things about me and buffy in the last month (thanks, FMM!), but i realized a couple months ago that buffy/angel has stopped being my otp. which, for the record, makes me very sad, because i did love them, once. but 6, and especially 7, are very, very true. that's why i had to stop shipping them. because if you put the two of them in the same room, not only would they be entirely different people from the people they once knew and loved, they would also, i think, be completely unable to understand the integral shifts that had gone on in the other's life. buffy died and then she lost herself and then she had a relationship with a man she was supposed to hate and then she stopped being alone in the world but was still irrevocably changed. angel lost his son and two of his best friends, and that's just at last body count of NFA. what would they say to each other? what could they possibly say? how could angel talk about connor or cordelia? how could buffy talk about spike? how do you have a relationship with someone when you can't speak about these deep, horrible pains (i would say especially for angel because A: HIS SON and b: i have always bought angel/cordy on a higher level than i did buffy/spike, but that's my biases. either way, this is multi-shippy, let's continue)? what do you do with that?

which is why i went back to buffy/riley. because 1. i always loved them and 2, riley is the only man buffy has ever known who had no expectations for her. he just expected her to be buffy, and when that changed, as it did, he took it. until he didn't, but that was more joss trying to write my bb boy off the show than anything else. i think if sam were dead, or divorced, and you put buffy and riley in the same space, no, it wouldn't be easy for them, but it would be real, and they could do it. i love them. etc.

SO ANYWAY THIS IS AN EPIC ESSAY ABOUT HOW I HAVE GROWN UP AND I THINK I LIKE THIS PART? i sometimes think of me moving past b/a as me moving past that sort of ~romanticized structure~ that was... so weird and very teenage-y, as stated, and moving toward a romantic structure that was based on mutual respect and understanding. this is why i like buffy most from season four on.

god this comment is so fucking long.
Edited 2010-03-30 01:48 (UTC)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
HON, SERIOUSLY. YOU WOULD NOT BELIEVE THIS GUY.

I seriously think I'm going to make a length post about the whole sordid affair tomorrow. GET YOUR RAGE ON! You would be so proud of me the way I ripped into him.

hat would they say to each other? what could they possibly say? how could angel talk about connor or cordelia? how could buffy talk about spike? how do you have a relationship with someone when you can't speak about these deep, horrible pains (i would say especially for angel because A: HIS SON and b: i have always bought angel/cordy on a higher level than i did buffy/spike, but that's my biases. either way, this is multi-shippy, let's continue)? what do you do with that?

Oh, exactly. Exactly. I actually have part of a never-to-be-finished fic dealing with those questions (among a lot of other things). And I love the idea of Angel/Cordy, but the execution was sucky, unfortunately.

I fundamentally disagree about Riley, because I think he wanted her to be other than Buffy: I think he wanted her to be emotionally open/dependent upon him to a degree that she was never capable of. I think he could be really good with someone else, but not with Buffy. But! I still think they're more workable than B/A, so UPGRADE!

However! When I look at your pretty, pretty icon, all I see is pretty! I love Buffy/Riley when I'm looking at that icon!

I LOVE YOUR LONG COMMENT. LOVE IT.

I think maybe that's why I never did the B/A thing beyond sorta kinda liking it the first two seasons when I watched it the first time. It never spoke to me because I was older, already in college, past the high school thing, and I also never had an experience similar to that to compare it to.

Anyway, I LIKE YOUR GROWING UP. AND YOUR LONG COMMENT. ALWAYS.

(no subject)

[identity profile] shamoogity.livejournal.com - 2010-03-30 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] molly_may - 2010-03-30 20:30 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] gabrielleabelle.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
If I quoted all the parts I liked, I'd be quoting back your entire post. So let me just say WORD.

I think post-series B/A would take a lot of work to make it. And even then, I don't know if it would pan out. I think their respective development on their own shows means they grew more apart rather than together.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
Hee! I often feel that way reading your posts!

I think their respective development on their own shows means they grew more apart rather than together. Exactly. And you summed up in one sentence what I prattled on about. *sigh* Good for you!

[identity profile] slaymesoftly.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
Re Angel/Buffy - WORD! All perfectly reasonable and sensible reasons for it to fail. You should point this all out to Scott Allie. :)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
Ha! I wonder if he would appreciate my capslocks and strikethroughs and exclamation points? I'm now envisioning sending it to him and laughing hysterically.

[identity profile] shamoogity.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
I had a conversation recently in which an acquaintance of mine said Avatar couldn't be racist because the Na'vi weren't Native American, they were aliens. Also, they were better than the humans, so if anything it was the opposite of racism. Totally infuriating.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. Isn't it amazing how thick people are?

This was actually the Last Airbender (I don't know if I made that clear?), but I had earlier had a bit of a discussion with him about Avatar in which he didn't see the racism either. BLIND.

(no subject)

[identity profile] shamoogity.livejournal.com - 2010-03-30 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] gigi-tastic.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
this is why i think your so amazing. all your points on angel buffy are spot on. i never really got what they talked about in the first place.. he's so.. boring. though the whole mannilow lov is epic beyond belife. i love when angelus and faith are fighting in the dream world and he says "the concerts were the worst" which gives me this great mind pictuer of angel with a lighter swaying back and forth

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
Haha! Angel at a concert! *dies laughing*

Aw! Thank you!

Also: that might be the greatest icon of all times. Just sayin'.

(no subject)

[identity profile] gigi-tastic.livejournal.com - 2010-03-30 03:18 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] dee81.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
Awesome, awesome list:

#1) Never saw the whole episode. Thought it was an evil waste of time

#3) You're the first person that I've read who made fun of that line. I thought it was annoying then, and think it's even more annoying now. And it totally sounds like Bella! (I'm a fan of Twilight, but when I see similarities between Buffy and Bella, I cringe).

#8) I'm behind on the comics but I heard about this...and I'm still confused. What the heck? And I read what happened right after Buffy found out Twilight's real identity and I found that even more bizarre.

I think Angel and Buffy were a huge backbone of BtVS...when they weren't a couple. The Angelus storyline was easily my favorite arc of the whole series, not because AngelandBuffyOMG but because it was disturbing, complex, and it shaped the characters from that point forward. I for one, found Angelus creepily (is that a word?) entertaining.

If people want to ship Angel/Buffy, totally cool. I just roll my eyes when I get picked on for enjoying their break ups better than their coupling.

And let's face it...even though Buffy and Angel are both very good-looking people...they looked very odd together. She's like the size of just one of his legs. (And he totally belongs with Darla or Cordelia!!!)

Spike however was just the right height for Buffy :)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks!

1. It was an evil waste of time. And the thing that infuriates me is how many people found it romantic!

3. It's soooo ridiculous! At the time, I remember thinking, "What does that even mean? Nonsense. But unhealthy nonsense."

8. YES. I AM UPSET.

ut because it was disturbing, complex, and it shaped the characters from that point forward. I for one, found Angelus creepily (is that a word?) entertaining. I agree one hundred percent.


And let's face it...even though Buffy and Angel are both very good-looking people...they looked very odd together. She's like the size of just one of his legs. (And he totally belongs with Darla or Cordelia!!!)

Spike however was just the right height for Buffy :)


There are no words for how much I agree!

[identity profile] serendipily.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
+*flail* Don't even MENTION how epically The Last Airbender has failed! What about my people?!!! *cries* Damn white-race dominance!
You know. I love guys like that. They're the most infuriating, insufferable, stupid people on the face of fandom. They are my one true love.

Okay I got a quick glance at this:

"When you kiss me, I want to die" is not a healthy sentiment. Actually, it's pretty much exactly like something I'd expect Bella Swan to say. Or Edward. *gag*

*squees* Once I get off work, I'm sooooooooo commenting.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
+ DAMN white-race dominance indeed! *says the white girl*

Hee! I look forward to it!

(no subject)

[identity profile] serendipily.livejournal.com - 2010-03-30 03:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] serendipily.livejournal.com - 2010-04-02 03:46 (UTC) - Expand
snickfic: Buffy looking over her shoulder (Default)

[personal profile] snickfic 2010-03-30 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
This is why Buffy and Spike work--Spike has that zest for life and that habit of seeing right through the others' crap and calling them on it.

And in my perfect Spuffy world (such as it is), Buffy does the same for Spike. 'Cuz Spike's his own flavor of drama queen, and he needs someone to chivvy him out of it from time to time.

Also, totally agree with you about Cordy/Angel. No, I can't say I saw chemistry (although I'm not much good at that anyway), but they'd have been good for each other. Cordy was way better for him than Buffy'd ever be.

But you're right, it's still all about Darla.

5. What would they talk about?

Yes. I complained about this from my very first watch through S2 - when did they ever do anything besides bandage each other up, kiss, and that one time when Buffy complained about her mom's boyfriend? They didn't even manage to do any actual ice skating. And I want to read your Spuffy ice skating fic!!!

YOU WIN. (I told you your capslock was rubbing off on me.) Yay big long thinky BtVS post!!!

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 02:58 am (UTC)(link)

And in my perfect Spuffy world (such as it is), Buffy does the same for Spike. 'Cuz Spike's his own flavor of drama queen, and he needs someone to chivvy him out of it from time to time.


Totally agreed.

They really could have been so good for each other, and one of the many reasons why Angel is such a disappointment to me is the way they botched that up so epically. *sigh*

DARLA DARLA DARLA! I keep chanting and it keeps being true!

hen did they ever do anything besides bandage each other up, kiss, and that one time when Buffy complained about her mom's boyfriend? They didn't even manage to do any actual ice skating. YES!

And I want to read your Spuffy ice skating fic!!! I thought of that while I was writing this. And now I might actually have to write it. *sigh* Or maybe I could make Emmie do it!

THANK YOU! (And I'm so pleased!) Perhaps this is a sign of things to come? Where I actually write things down instead of keeping them in my head?

(no subject)

[personal profile] snickfic - 2010-03-30 06:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com - 2010-03-30 09:11 (UTC) - Expand
ext_41724: (DRAG MY TEETH ACROSS YOUR CHEST)

CLEARLY WE CAN NO LONGER BE FRIENDS

[identity profile] ineffort.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 03:10 am (UTC)(link)


HDU, LAUREN. HDUUUUUUU.

Re: CLEARLY WE CAN NO LONGER BE FRIENDS

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
CLEARLY I AM SO FAR ABOVE YOU THAT YOU YOU ARE RIGHT: NO FRIENDS FOR US.

Photobucket

Photobucket

OH I DARE. OH. I. DARE.

I have missed you! And your .gifs! And your general awesomeness! How goes life?
Edited 2010-03-30 03:21 (UTC)

[identity profile] hkath.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 04:47 am (UTC)(link)
Hell to the yes on all these points! Weirdly enough, all my favourite things about Angel are the things that make him a terrible match for Buffy. His complete out-of-touchness, the references to Bonanza that no one gets because he's been around since the dawn of time... the fatherhood that finally forced him to grow beyond his remarkable self-involvement into a person she'd barely recognize.

Did NO ONE weigh in about the New Kids On The Block?? Buffy was obviously a Jordan girl! Ah, Jordan, with his mom jeans and his falsetto and his long rat-tail of tunefulness. She definitely loved Jordan. The tacky figure-skating side of her adored him. :)

(I had the Joe and Jordan Ken dolls. Oh, the memories.)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
all my favourite things about Angel are the things that make him a terrible match for Buffy.

OH YES. It's weird: there are so many things about Angel that I just hate (making decisions for other people's "good" is guaranteed to make me stabby), but then he'll make a Bonanza reference (which I get because my mama still watches that show on occasion) or snark with Spike or be a dad, and I'm like I LOVE THIS GUY. It's very extreme, my love-hate relationship with this guy.

THANK YOU! I really wanted to know which NKotB Buffy would love! Her Jordan-love is now canon for me! Yay!

(Hee! They were just a bit before my time, so I was clueless.)

[identity profile] that-september.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 06:18 am (UTC)(link)
I would love to hear your thoughts about the race fail in Avatar: The Last Airbender. I've seen bits and pieces of the series thanks to my little sister, but never a ton, and it was very clever from what I saw, so I was excited for the live action movie. When I recently saw the trailers, I was shocked to see everyone was white except for the kid playing Zuko or whatever his name is (the kid from Slumdog Millionaire, right?), but then wondered what the race of the characters was supposed to be in actuality. They're drawn in an anime style, so I wasn't sure. Obviously, not white, but are they supposed to be Asian? In any case, it's ridiculous that white people continue to be cast in roles that are clearly not for white people.

As for the why Buffy should not be with Angel thoughts, I can't comment on a lot of it since I haven't seen AtS (I really need to, it seems lol) but I can agree that I find them boring together. Angel/Buffy does remind me of Bella and Edward, or perhaps more accurately, Duncan and Veronica. I never particularly felt one way or another about Duncan--he was just this blah character, the traditional "first love" but not anyone exciting. Logan is Veronica's Spike. Angel and Buffy just don't have much chemistry together, in my opinion. I wasn't sad to see Angel go--he was a solid character, and I like David Boreanaz, but as you pointed out, very blah.

(And um, yeah, as for Spike and Buffy, talk about out of this world sex. Destroying a house is kind of epic.)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, yes, the kid from SM and Skins. Who I'm fond of. But think is miscast quite apart from anything having to do with race.

Yeah, the creators have said multiple times that they're supposed to be Asian. It's probably not clear from watching just a few episodes, but the world of the show is entirely Asian. Europe, Africa, the other continents--they don't exist. So everyone is Asian. :)

In any case, it's ridiculous that white people continue to be cast in roles that are clearly not for white people.
YES. It is.

YES. I love your Veronica/Duncan comparison! Boring first love! Precisely!

Angel actually gets a lot more complex over on his own show. He develops a personality, really. And he does some things I HATE that are supposed to be justified, but there are moments I really, really, really love him. It's worth checking out, even if it's pretty much made of gender!fail. *sigh*

(YES IT IS.)
elisi: Edwin and Charles (All!Penguin AU ftw by gillo)

[personal profile] elisi 2010-03-30 06:25 am (UTC)(link)
Wordy McWord. :)

(Also this post made me laugh muchly, but I have children to get to school, so I'll reofrain from quoting...)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm am very pleased to think it made you laugh! Your icon constantly makes me giggle!

(no subject)

[personal profile] elisi - 2010-03-30 20:10 (UTC) - Expand
ext_7351: (αΩ | † | § | breathe)

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_jems_/ 2010-03-30 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
Oh god, YES! The only way I can ever see Buffy and Angel working out is in a world free from conflict, where they can just stare into each others' eyes (or whatever it is that they do when they're together. That's pretty much the only thing that comes to mind for me). As soon as a conflict arose - in their relationship or anywhere else - they would finally have to try to mesh their two world views, their different approaches, their two leadership roles and things would just fall apart in a heartbeat.

Well, either a world free of conflict or a world where Buffy regresses into a state of permanent 15-year-old-ness, where Angel is allowed to take the reins in every aspect of their lives, including slaying. And while I think that happens a lot of the time when they're together (excepting that one time when she came for Faith and he refused and it went pretty much how I'd see any interaction between them going from there on out), I don't think she could regress to that state permanently. It usually happens because he arrives for a very limited time when she's feeling particularly vulnerable.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
OH YES. YES YES YES.

It usually happens because he arrives for a very limited time when she's feeling particularly vulnerable.
This, particularly, is so true and important to note.

[identity profile] rebcake.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 07:07 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, people. Why do you fail so hard?

I'll just share with you what my mother-in-law says in these cases:

"Ai, mi hija, they don't know."

It's stood me in good stead for years. It implies no malice on the part of the person who is failing, just ignorance. She may be more patient than you or I would be, though, having lived with fail for far longer. All you can do is try to educate, or remove yourself. Removal only works to keep you from getting upset, but doesn't change the situation outside your immediate vicinity.

You know all this, so I'll be shutting up now.

1-10=WIN! Not that I have an opinion or anything. ;-}

P.S. I found something to disagree with. It was hard, but I managed!

Spike's okay with being Buffy's LEFT-hand man. And that makes them fit. *nods*

P.P.S. My favorite Buffy/Angel moment is when she burns her cross into his chest when they're a'kissin'. It never got better than that, for me.
Edited 2010-03-30 07:40 (UTC)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Your mother-in-law is a wise woman.

You're very right about everything, and it's always a good reminder!

Honestly, the reason I was so hard on this guy is because A) he consistently makes himself out to be a victim, even in situations where he clearly isn't and B) he refuses to believe that anyone has things worse than he does. I'm usually much more patient with others' ignorance--I like having "teachable moments" and helping others learn, just as I like it when they are patient with me and help me learn. But there was a larger context of this guy being particularly loathsome, so I let him have it because it was just the last straw, you know?

Spike's okay with being Buffy's LEFT-hand man. And that makes them fit. *nods*
HAHAHA! WIN!

I agree: that's a fantastic moment, symbolically and visually. And it's all downhill from there.

[identity profile] petzipellepingo.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
To all of the above : Word!.

That is all.

[identity profile] author-by-night.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 08:55 am (UTC)(link)
You've just summed up my issues with the pairing as well.

Especially the point that ultimately, they can't do justice to one another; with the exception of season six and I guess the beginning of early season seven, Spike wasn't this mysterious lover Buffy screwed her friends over for. In season three, Angelus had destroyed Giles in so many ways, and yet when Angel came back Buffy went right back to where she left off with him.

I actually did like them on Buffy, but something about their romance didn't seem quite right, and when I watched AtS I realized why. Without Buffy, Angel actually possessed a personality. A brooding, often controlling personality, but nonetheless, he did more than give Buffy information and make out with her in assorted graveyards.

The other thing is that Angel was always just... there. Spike better fit the personality of the show; he was dark, he was witty, he interacted with characters other than Buffy. Besides seeming to have an odd sort of near-friendship with Giles (who could have held a far worse grudge on the guy than he did), Angel never did any of those things. The reason he was given his own show was that he just didn't fit into the same one as Buffy.

My biggest issue with Spike is his actions in season six. Even taking part in the S&M, IMHO, was wrong on some level, because he knew the only reason Buffy was getting all submissive with him was because she was trying to feel something. You're right, she did have clinical depression, and he took advantage of that. Then he tried to rape her. That killed the pairing for me, even if he did get a soul.

Honestly, I think had the show taken different directions, I can see Buffy with either. But between Angel and Buffy's tendency to turn into a soap opera couple and the things Spike put Buffy through, I'm not sure I think either vampire is Mr. Right.

(Sorry, I know you're a huge Spuffy shipper.)

Oh, and I agree, Cordy/Angel would've worked. I wish Joss Whedon had at least given them a few episodes as a true couple. But we all know how much the man loves happy couples.
Edited 2010-03-30 08:57 (UTC)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Without Buffy, Angel actually possessed a personality. A brooding, often controlling personality, but nonetheless, he did more than give Buffy information and make out with her in assorted graveyards.
YES. I sometimes hate Angel violently and other times he brings me great joy, but I think there's no denying that he's infinitely more interesting on his own show and fit in there much better.

I honestly have never understood the reasoning that Spike should have known better. He had no conscience, no moral compass. Yeah, he took advantage of her, because that's what soulless creatures do. And though I thought their relationship in S6 was endlessly fascinating, it definitely wasn't healthy, and I'd never argue that it was. I ship souled!Spike/Buffy (and, actually, S5!Spike/Buffy, because that was back when we still could believe he could be redeemed without a soul). If we forgive Angel for years of murder, including Jenny Calender (whom I love), raping and torturing Dru till she lost her mind, etc. just because he gets a soul back, why would we not forgive Spike when he went out and got his soul out of remorse?

(No need to apologize. I'm all for people holding whatever opinons they want! Ship Buffy/Snyder and go forth in peace!)

I wish Joss Whedon had at least given them a few episodes as a true couple. But we all know how much the man loves happy couples.
Agreed. *sigh*
scarfman: (Default)

[personal profile] scarfman 2010-03-30 08:57 am (UTC)(link)

Lalalala can't hear you.

Seriously, you make some points that I'll now feel necessary to rebut in my stories.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a fantastic compliment! I'm all for inspiring more creativity in the world! :D

And if you do, please link them here. I pretty much never read B/A (not relevant to my interests, obviously) except for a bit of B/A/S and Buffy/Angelus, but I would love to see your thoughts.

(no subject)

[personal profile] scarfman - 2010-03-31 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] scarfman - 2010-04-22 04:42 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] tabitha666.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
ILU. This is awesome. I totally agree with everything you said about Spike being more on Buffy's level.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee! Thanks!

[identity profile] amyxaphania.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
I'm just gonna sit here nodding my head, because I agree with all you said.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I love agreement!

Page 1 of 2