Entry tags:
Annoyance of the day:
People who flat-out say that Buffy didn't love Spike despite the fact that she said she did.
She said she did. The only reason we have to believe that she didn't is one thing Spike said, and since when do people believe anything that comes out of Spike's mouth? Boy can speak the truth that no one else will, but he also says a ton of b.s., and everyone knows it.
I just hatehatehatehatehatehate all of these people sitting around telling a woman (and it would be a woman--if a man said, it I think a lot less people would disagree with her) who finds it nearly impossible to say the words "I love you" even to people she regards as family (remember "Intervention"? That's canon) that she doesn't love someone when she said she did.
I don't have a problem with people quibbling over the nature of her love. You can argue that she didn't love him romantically or as much as she did Angel or whatever (I would disagree with the first one and re: the second, I would remind you that, as
the_royal_anna says, we don't love in amounts. We love in ways). That's legit. But to say, flat-out, that she didn't love him even though she says she did takes agency away from Buffy in a way that I am entirely uncomfortable with and that DRIVES ME CRAZY, OKAY. If she had said she loved Riley (she didn't, did she?), I would be pissed at people saying she didn't love him, either. Uuuugh why does this annoy me so much?
She said she did. The only reason we have to believe that she didn't is one thing Spike said, and since when do people believe anything that comes out of Spike's mouth? Boy can speak the truth that no one else will, but he also says a ton of b.s., and everyone knows it.
I just hatehatehatehatehatehate all of these people sitting around telling a woman (and it would be a woman--if a man said, it I think a lot less people would disagree with her) who finds it nearly impossible to say the words "I love you" even to people she regards as family (remember "Intervention"? That's canon) that she doesn't love someone when she said she did.
I don't have a problem with people quibbling over the nature of her love. You can argue that she didn't love him romantically or as much as she did Angel or whatever (I would disagree with the first one and re: the second, I would remind you that, as

no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Buffy: I have someone in my life now, that I love. It's not what you and I had, it's very new. You know what makes it new? I trust him, I know him.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But there's a difference; the difference is in the way she said it. That makes all the difference in the world.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
"You're full of love. It's brighter than the fire. Blinding. That's why you pull away from it. [...] Love. Give. Forgive. Love will bring you to your gift."
Buffy is "full of love". The narrative shoots down the idea that she's incapable of loving. The Slayer is love. Buffy's fear is not the truth.
I mean, it's like me fearing I'd be a horrible mom. That I'm incapable or something. That doesn't make it true, it means I'm afraid it might be true.
And honestly, people really don't do a good job psychoanalyzing themselves, especially not Buffy who's not much for self-reflection. Her fears do not spell reality.
no subject
And can I just say how silly it is that we all trust Holden so much as some sort of voice of reason--that the things Buffy says in that conversation are somehow the Only Truth About Buffy Summers ever revealed?
He's trying to kill her, for one. And two--he's, like, a sophomore in college. WTF. So, he's taken 3 psych classes, and now the state of California is completely willing to license him to see patients in graveyards? That's just nonsense. He's a kid who got a good grade in psychology. It doesn't mean that his 10 minute conversation with Buffy tells us more about her than watching her develop for ourselves for 7 years does.
no subject
no subject