lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([btvs] ask me how)
lirazel ([personal profile] lirazel) wrote2010-05-07 10:41 am

Sexuality, Consent, and the Buffyverse

A comment over on the website-which-shall-not-be-named got me thinking.

Here it is:

It is horrid but their sex brought on the end of the world so it was never meant to be a positive development. It’s already happened to her once before in Where the Wild Things Are when something urged Buffy and Riley on and they were turned into mindless sex zombies who had "no control over themselves." This time it's only has larger and more disastrous consequences.

It may be squicky but I’d still prefer that story to a story where Buffy
knowingly jumped the bones of Twangel and didn’t care that the world started crumbling down around her.

There are about seventy places I could go with this (like, how very, very much I hate WtWTA), but what I really want to get to is this:

Why does questionable sex have to be at the heart of this at all? I hated WtWTA; I hate this. I'm so incredibly over Joss's whole SEX LEADS TO BADNESS thing. And reducing the entire plot of the season to Who Buffy Boinks...seriously?

So let’s talk about consent and sexual punishment in the Buffyverse. I don’t have any deep insights into it; I haven’t really done enough thinking about it for that. But I would like to start up some conversations about it.

And it’s all gonna be behind a cut for the sake of [livejournal.com profile] mollivanders, as not to spoil her, and for the sake of the portion of my flist that could care less about my natterings about BtVS


1. Rape. And attempted rape. There’s lots of it on the show. More than you’d likely think. These are the ones that came to mind:
A. Hyena!Xander tries to rape Buffy, pretends he doesn’t remember doing so after he’s no longer possessed
B. Angel(us) rapes the Romani girl he kills; it’s strongly implied (I believe? It’s been a while since I’ve seen it) that rape was part of the torture he and Darla used to break Drusilla (as was slaughtering her entire family. Hey! I wrote fic about that!).
C. Faith tries to rape Xander in “Consequences”
D. Faith does rape Riley in “Who Are You?”*
E. Buffy and Riley are taken over by a poltergeist thing and made to have sex for hours
F. Willow rapes Tara by altering her mind with magic.**
G. Spike attempts to rape Buffy (and later heavily implies that he raped others pre-soul)
H. The Universe makes Buffy and Angel have sex; how much of it was their choice is very, very, very unclear
I. Katrina. Warren completely controls her mind and attempts to rape her.
J. As this has no real-life equivalent, it's murky, but you can definitely argue that by having sex in Buffy's body, Faith is raping Buffy as well.
K. Buffy keeps going after Spike tells her to stop in "Gone." Spike keeps going after Buffy tells him to stop in "Wrecked." Repeat ad nauseum.
L. Angel(us) rapes Holtz's wife. "Repeatedly."
M. Cordy is possessed when she has sex with Connor--how much of that was Cordy and how much of it was Jasmine is entirely subjective and unclear.
N. Angelus threatens to rape both Fred and Buffy; he tells Lilah he'll "rape [her] to death": his modus operandi seems to be the threat of sexualized violence.
O. The Slayer's power was forced on her by a group of powerful men without her consent in one of the skeeviest of rape metaphors. Then they threaten to do the same to Buffy in "Get It Done," adding some absolutely appalling racist overtones to the whole thing.
P. "In Epiphany Cordelia is held down by the Skilosh demons, screaming "no, no" while a phallic-shaped object protruding from one of the demon's mouths, is forced into the back of her head to "impregnate" her with the Skilosh "young" (the creepy, icky third eye) - all this while her menfolk are racing to save her. I swear, I get so damned uncomfortable watching that scene - if it weren't the back of her head, but lower down her torso, it wouldn't even be a question of whether she was raped. She was." - [livejournal.com profile] samsom
Q. "Also, I consider her encounter with Wilson Christopher to be rape because he was acting as a 'substitute' or conduit for the demon that impregnated her - both without her knowledge or consent." - [livejournal.com profile] samsom
R. "I'd include Angel throwing Darla through and glass door, pushing her onto his bed on a rape list. While she wasn't fighting him the way Buffy fought Spike, it wasn't totally consentual either; she looked scared after he threw her through that glass door."> - [livejournal.com profile] menomegirl
S. In "Go Fish," the swim team captain comes on to Buffy several times, she tries to defend herself, and she is victim blamed by Snyder. (suggested by [livejournal.com profile] scarfman)
T. Angel and Eve have sex while under the influence of whatever's wrong with Lorne in "Life of the Party" (that's the episode title, right?). We have every reason to believe that Angel would not choose to have sex with her if he weren't under that influence. This is played for laughs.
U. via [livejournal.com profile] sockmoneyhere on Spider and Spike in IDW's comics: "Having taken a fancy to Spike, she 'visits' him in the cell: crawls onto his lap, forces a kiss on his mouth, unzips his pants, and demands that he get an erection so that she can mount him. He's both drawn and written as showing disgust, and tries to kick her away. He asks her to help his suffering human companions, and she scoffs that they're dead already. He demands to know if Fred is all right, and Spider pouts, 'Stop thinking about her! Think about ME!'" More here.

More wonky consent, suggested by [livejournal.com profile] prophecygirrl and [livejournal.com profile] local_max:

V. "Him" - All of the women are completely overtaken with love for RJ because of his stupid lettermen's jacket (that is just a dumb metaphor. There's some super-funny parts of this episode, but seriously?). Buffy either ends up having sex with him or almost ends up having sex with him. Shady consent. Plus: teacher/student relationships have such an inherent power imbalance, especially in high school situations, that the consent was shady from the other direction as well.
V. Buffy and Spike in "Something Blue"--they definitely wouldn't be kissing each other under other circumstances; it's played for laughs.
X. "Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered" - All of the women are completely overtaken with love for Xander because of his spell backfiring. Thankfully, no actual sex happens, but Buffy and Willow both come on to him. Shadiness abounds.
Y. Times when sex isn't the point, but mind-control is played for laughs and then physical intimacy enters the equation. None of these are particularly horrible in and of themselves. i) Joyce and Giles in "Band Candy." ii) Giles and Anya could have ended up doing much more than kiss in "Tabula Rasa." iii) "You could (I don't think I would--but pattern) argue that people being swept up with the emotion of the OMWF spell constitute some tricky consent stuff. (We only know about Willow/Tara, which has other issues.)" - [livejournal.com profile] local_max (I agree. I probably wouldn't argue that last one, though I'm including it here.)



*I’m not arguing about this one. We have every reason to believe that if Riley had known that was Faith, he wouldn’t have slept with her. By withholding such vital information, it negates consent. Yes, that was rape. If you want to argue about this, do it elsewhere—not in my journal.
**Once again, I’m not arguing about this. Not only is the magic clearly a metaphor for “date-rape” drugs, but, again, we have every reason to believe Tara would have refused sex (out of anger at Willow) had Willow not used the magic. That was rape, too. Again: if you want to argue about this do it elsewhere—not in my journal.

It’s entirely possible I’m forgetting something. Surely there’s something on AtS? I’d be shocked if there wasn’t.

So what we see is lots of issues of rape or shady consent (WtWTA). And how many of them are taken seriously? Well, “Seeing Red” certainly is. A lot of people have problems with it (including me—I don’t have a problem with it from the perspective of Spike’s story, but I do from Buffy’s: it makes her a victim and reduces her story to something to serve Spike’s story, and on a feminist show that’s All About Buffy, this is problematic) and think it could be handled better in the aftermath (including me), but there’s never any doubt that this is both Bad and a Major Thing.

The rapes of Dru and the Romani girl are there to show how bad Angelus is and to show why Angel needs a soul. Since they take place in the past, there isn’t a whole lot of delving into them, though I think that both Dru’s mental fragile state forever after and the Romani’s commitment to watching Angel prove that those instances are taken pretty seriously.

But I really don’t think Willow ever realizes just why Tara is upset; I really don’t think she ever realizes it’s rape. So I have a lot of problems with the writers having Tara go back to her. I’m pretty sure that Faith’s treatment of Xander is never mentioned again and her treatment of Riley isn’t really examined, either. Hyena!Xander is mentioned again, and yes: there really were extenuating circumstances, but nothing? Really?

As for Space Sex, we have yet to see how it’s gonna be handled, but I don’t have much hope at this point.

2. Sex Leads to Badness. Now, some of these work quite well, plot-wise. I don’t have a problem with most of them on their own; it’s only when they’re located within the context of all the others that they become problematic. So don’t tell me about how awesome the Angelus plotline in S2 is; I think so, too. I’m not talking about isolated incidents: I’m talking about the pattern of the show(s). And I’m listing these in the order they come to mind.
A. Buffy sleeps with Angel; he loses his soul, becomes evil, terrorizes Sunnydale, kills Jenny Calendar (sob!) and Willow’s fish, then Buffy has to send him to hell.
B. Buffy sleeps with Parker and is used by him. (And gets her revenge by going all Cave!Buffy on him in a scene of awesome.)
C. Buffy sleeps with Spike, becomes even more self-loathing, beats him in an alley, then he nearly rapes her. The cause and effect doesn’t have to be there, and obviously, Buffy is a complete victim and nothing she did caused the rape. Still, there are enough people who feel like something she did led to the AR that I feel comfortable with having it on this list. Also, rough sex is depicted as something only bad people do, something Buffy would never, ever do while in her right mind. There's the (really, when you think about it, quite horrifying) "Tell me I'm bad" scene with Tara. [livejournal.com profile] prophecygirrl has more on that here
D. Buffy sleeps with Angel, causes earthquakes, tsunamis, and horrible loss of life on earth. Also: ascends to a higher plane, then comes back within one issue. WHAT.
Compare this to: Buffy has sex with Riley; their relationship ends as most relationships do (except that in this case the guy acts like a horrible passive-aggressive douchebag before he leaves. I recently rewatched “Into the Woods” and am bitter). There's loads of bad things going on with their breakup [livejournal.com profile] parallatic talks way more about this here and pretty much sums up my feelings, but there's no literal repercussions, so we'll be generous and put this in the "good" column. Buffy has sex with Satsu; it’s depicted that she enjoys it, but everyone is very quick to reassure each other and the audience that she’s not at all gay. *eyeroll* 4 out of her 6 sexual relationship have negative consequences beyond just the “We eventually break up” variety. That’s 2/3, right, mathly people?
E. Xander sleeps with Faith; she later tries to rape him. (It’s been a loooooong time since I’ve watched S3, so this isn’t quite clear in my mind. I reread transcripts, but that’s not quite the same as watching the episode. Any elucidation would be appreciated.)
F. Veruca sleeps with Oz, gets torn apart. Literally.
G. Tara sleeps with Willow; Willow rapes her to keep her sleeping with her. (Uh, pronoun stuff going on there.)
H. Tara sleeps with Willow (without resolving the earlier rape issues) and is murdered by Warren. (In an interesting have-sex-and-then-die moment much like the very horror movie tropes Joss claims to subvert.)
I. Cordelia sleeps with that random guy, gets supernaturally pregnant. So do a bunch of other women.
J. Darla sleeps with Angel, gets pregnant, then must sacrifice herself for her child in a very Motherhood Will Save Her kind of moment.
K. Cordelia sleeps with Connor, gives birth to Jasmine, goes into a coma, “comes back” for the space of an episode to “get her guy back on track,” then dies.
L. Anya gleefully and healthily embraces her sexuality and is constantly told to be more appropriate because it makes those around her nervous and/or uncomfortable. (Yes, I think there’s a time and place to talk about sex and Anya needs to learn that. But this is within the pattern/context of the show.)
M. Giles and Jenny are about to consummate their relationship and OH GUESS WHAT SHE’S DEAD AND LAID OUT ON YOUR BED, GILES. (I’m still bitter about this.)
N. "Dawn doesn't sleep with Kenny - she sleeps with his roommate (because her feelings for Kenny were too intense and so it's less pressure to sleep with his roommate - IDEK) and then Kenny gets pissed and curses her." - from [livejournal.com profile] eowyn_315 So this guy punishes her by turning her into a centaur, a giant, and a doll. WHAT.
O. Dawn's first kiss turns out to be a vampire and she has to stake him.
P. The frat boys in "Selfless" are vengenced by Anya after (if I remember correctly) humiliating some girls.
Q. Katrina breaks up with Warren; he mind-controls her; he attempts to rape her; she dies.
R. Xander and Ms. French in "Teacher's Pet." Sex was going to involve having his head bit off. Yeah.
S. Xander making jokes about bondage in "Him"...and then he is tied up, but not for fun: his date goes after him with a knife.


I’m fairly sure there’s more. Anything you can remember, let me know: I’ll add it to the list.

Then there’s a pregnancy metaphor dealing with bodily autonomy in which Fred’s body (and it has to be a woman, doesn’t it?) is taken over by an entirely different entity which kills her and destroys her soul. (Really, Joss? Her soul?) “A Hole in the World” is a well-written episode with some great moments (Spike’s little speech in the Deeper Well is one of my favorite moments on the show), but there’s some annoying stuff going on here: she’s the only woman left, and all the menfolk stand around her bedside and then decide They. Must. Save. Her! Not to mention that she’s just entered a romantic relationship and that she seems to have lost her personality in S5 and is just there to serve the stories of men (Wes and Spike, in particular). Something about the whole thing just skeeves me out. More about that here and here (for some reason, the filter at my work has blocked this, but I remember it being really awesome).

Plus, Joss doesn't really handle pregnancy in all its complexity. I was just talking with [livejournal.com profile] xlivvielockex about Charisma Carpenter (among other things), and she said, "Not to mention S4 and Expecting seemed very...anti-pregnancy to me." Yeah. Anti-pregnancy without realizing the complexity of the situation for a woman. He's looking at it from a privileged position, just like he's looking at prostitution from a privileged position on Firefly and Dollhouse, and he seems completely unaware of it. But that's a whole 'nother issue. For way more of her thoughts on pregnancy, see the comment here--it's quite excellent.

I really don’t know where I’m going with this. I just know that seeing 34/35 of the S8 comics made my stomach sink: more questionable consent? More Sex Is Bad-ness? Do we really need that? Does the entirety of the plot for S8 really need to be reduced to the Universe wanting Buffy and Angel to have sex? Really? I’m not a fan of Shag or Die in fanfic (except for [livejournal.com profile] botias’s Persephone, but there are exceptions to every rule, right?), much less in canon, and the whole thing feels unnecessary. Do we really need another plotline boiled down to Who Buffy’s Boinking?

Making it worse, we have confirmation that 34 for was the first installment all plotted out and that everything was building up to that (as this is the case, it makes the pacing of the season even worse and even more nonsensical, doesn’t it?). The whole thing makes me headdesk. (Who's got a link for this interview? Help me out, please.)

I want to know what y’all think. I know there are some positive depictions of sex on the show and and that just showing women embracing their sexuality was new and different for TV when the show as on the air. But I don’t know. I just feel sick of all this stuff, and I want to have a dialogue with y’all about it. Share your thoughts. Let me know what you think.

But do not argue with me about what constitutes rape above (I don’t expect this from my flist, but who knows who’ll wander in here) and do not try to defend these things in isolation. I’m looking at patterns and context. That’s what we’re talking about. If you want to talk about those things go somewhere else. I’ll give you a warning, then delete your comment if you don’t listen. Okay? Okay!

[identity profile] ohwaluvusbab.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 07:12 am (UTC)(link)
Oh man. I thought I was the only one who cringes at the "That's what I keep saying."

[identity profile] ohwaluvusbab.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
And speaking of sex... I SEE YOU THAR WITH THAT ICON I USED TO HAVE ;)

[identity profile] probablecylon.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 07:47 am (UTC)(link)
The Nature-as-Agent speeches of Giles seemed directed at the idea that Nature doesn't act in the interests of the human species. The real problem is with the attempt to present Sex-as-Good when it's Hey-Metaphysically-Stoned-Soul-Sex-Is-Good. It's the old "Hey, sex is natural, so you should sleep with me" approach -- except here it was "This is natural, in fact hypernatural, and if you don't like it, you are anti-sex". It wasn't just Buffy under the influence -- we were being told, along with her, "You'll take it and like it." There was no attempt to render the sex remotely questionable for a moment. None of the blurry hallucinatory bits of WtWTA.

The reduction of sex to sex-as-schtick has as its fallout the trivialization of sexual assault, which is only made more problematic by the collision between the fictional & non-fictional scenarios in "Seeing Red", by leaving 'she was playing with fire' as a plausible reading of the narrative despite the obscenity of its assertion in life. Its contrived & arbitrary use is sensationalistic -- actually worse, even imposing trauma, because the camera angle puts us in Buffy's place.

[identity profile] ohwaluvusbab.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
Good discussion is good.

Well, “Seeing Red” certainly is. A lot of people have problems with it (including me—I don’t have a problem with it from the perspective of Spike’s story, but I do from Buffy’s: it makes her a victim and reduces her story to something to serve Spike’s story, and on a feminist show that’s All About Buffy, this is problematic)

Word. I think [livejournal.com profile] rahirah made a post once about how it might possibly have been the culmination of a 'Buffy the victim' arc? Well, whatever it was supposed to be, it was poorly handled. (Unpopular opinion here, but) I don't actually have a beef at all with Spike's actions within the story, but... If they were going for that real-life parallel with Marti as the aggressor, it should have been executed completely differently. (From what I hear, the scene came off a lot more violent than it was supposed to.) Definitely NO victimisation of Buffy. In my ideal Buffy-world, the scene went as follows: Spike tries to get Buffy to have sex again. Buffy pleads with him to drop it and tries to remove herself. Spike doesn't get it, and gets more desperate and unwittingly aggressive. Buffy kicks him across the room right after slipping on the floor. They're both upset. Buffy is crying because of how awful things have become between them. It's made clear that Spike probably wouldn't have managed to stop himself by himself, but we're spared the obnoxious floor struggle. The end. Actually, I have NO IDEA why they didn't just go with the scene I envisioned. No idea.

*goes off to check out links*
quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Default)

[personal profile] quinara 2010-05-08 08:24 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe. But I don't think it's very obvious at all, really - a sarcastic 'yep!' or a hundred other things would have emphasised that idea with no two ways about it. I mean, the nerdboi just leaves that scene confused and if he's (the way he is quite blatantly) our avatar, then there should be no doubt in his mind what Buffy means.
quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Default)

[personal profile] quinara 2010-05-08 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
*nods* She's one of my icons, but one that I look to when I want to know how to be kick-arse and cool and strong, not when I need some feminist-theory inspiration.
quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Default)

[personal profile] quinara 2010-05-08 08:37 am (UTC)(link)
I think BtVS was intended to be a feminist show, but did a really uneven job of it. For me, it's a question of whether BtVS has enough (pop culture) feminist cred to burn that I'm willing to put up with the fail and give the dubious stuff a pass.

I think someone else might have said it, but I agree that, the way I see it, BtVS was intended to subvert an idea that was inherently misogynistic, so came by feminism naturally - but there was never an actual aim to take it there. Which left a lot of dodginess when they tried to use the mythos of the show as a 'female empowerment' metaphor, because it both was and it wasn't.

And, ooh, thanks for the essay. Yeah, I suppose it really does say something to have Buffy as the hero. Cool beans! (Even if I do love her as her self-assured S7 incarnation. Though I also wonder what it says that when Buffy does become the Final Girl - like in the Wish - she actually dies. Because that seems like an unnecessary corollary, and seems to me to say that female survival can only be shifted/inverted, rather than equally spread out... I might be too attached to Wishverse!Buffy.)
quinara: Sheep on a hillside with a smiley face. (Default)

[personal profile] quinara 2010-05-08 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
Nope, me too! They could have made that line so much better, I think, if they wanted it to say something other than what comes across on first hearing...
scarfman: (Default)

[personal profile] scarfman 2010-05-08 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)

It may be noted in other comments I haven't read, but your rape list leaves out the swimteam episode when the team captain comes on to Buffy several times and she's always the one who gets into trouble for defending herself.

Edit I know exactly what you mean and I don't believe things are going to change in anything that Whedon writes or has creative control over.

Edited 2010-05-08 14:25 (UTC)

[identity profile] green-maia.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd noticed some of this, but not all of it, and the way you lay it all out, and show the patterns...wow. Just WOW.

This post is BRILLIANT.


(Personally, I think that what Willow did to Tara, and what Warren did to Katrina, is worse than rape - because violating someone's mind is worse than violating their body...)


THANK YOU FOR POSTING THIS!!!!!!!!!


*adds to memories*

liliaeth: (Default)

[personal profile] liliaeth 2010-05-08 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd also add Buffy's attempted rape of Spike in Gone. Spike clearly asks her to leave, she starts to go down on him, and he has to throw her out to get her to stop. Afterwards we hear her grumbling about how he had the guts to do so to her. (and this after, while she was invisible, she threw him against a wall and initiated sex with him, before she even let him know it was her.)
liliaeth: (Default)

[personal profile] liliaeth 2010-05-08 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Probably because they wanted us to see Buffy as the victim. From what I've heard, they felt that too many fans were siding with Spike, instead of with Buffy during s6. Identifying with Spike as the victim of Buffy rather than the other way around. So they tried to turn things around make us forget Buffy's abusive behavior by forcing our face into the whole 'see Spike is the bad guy' perspective. Which imho didn't work, because they'd spent too much of the season showing a depressed Buffy using, taking advantage and manipulating someone who loved her and didn't have the moral understanding to realize that what Buffy was doing was hurting her as well as himself.

Now I won't say that what Spike did wasn't wrong, but it didn't happen in a vacuum and considering that the scene in SR was mostly filmed from Spike's perspective once again... it just made it feel like one of those soap scenes where they try and redeem the 'heroine' by having her raped so we'd pick her side.

[identity profile] gabrielleabelle.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
While it would have conveyed the same message, I think a sarcastic "Yep" would have been at odds with the tone of the scene (and Buffy's response). Buffy's feeling wistful and at an end of her journey. I like the way she phrased her response because it isn't obvious. It makes you think. She's contemplative. Over five years of Slaying and trying to show people that 'girls' can be strong, and people are still questioning her about it. And now she's about to save the world (hopefully) and this random kid is telling her she's 'just' a girl?

I still love it. It's subtle, which I adore. It makes you think. It's not hitting you over the head with a sledgehammer to drive home what Buffy means (I abhor episodes that use the sledgehammer method). I wouldn't want it changed.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
That's exactly how I reacted to your nudity in S8/male gaze post. Just seem it quantified....

It seems like Joss doesn't realize he's playing with a misogynist deck and only thought to turn around one card to subvert it--all other 51 cards he's wheeling and dealing. FUCK THAT. OH YES. I love the way you've phrased this.

It's been so long since I've seen that episode that I'd forgotten that. Thanks for the reminder. I need to put that in there, too.
elisi: Edwin and Charles (Spike - Seeing Red by earth_vexer)

[personal profile] elisi 2010-05-08 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been meaning to comment on this post for days, but am not sure when I'll find the time, so I'll just mention something it reminded me of.

[livejournal.com profile] rm is watching Buffy & Angel for the first time (with her girlfriend, who's seen both shows before), and this quote from a post stuck with me:

That said, I've gotten to the point with both Angel and Buffy where I just look over at Patty sometimes and say "rapetastic plotline #873."

It's commented upon in the comments:

This. And you know, I still can't entirely decide if this is Joss perpetuating dumb things about culture or Joss being really savvy to real elements of risk and discomfort in the culture.

Stupid Joss.


To which [livejournal.com profile] rm replied:

I'm sort of at "neither" on that question. I think he, like many creators, has an obsession he can't work out, and keeps trying to work it out in his stories. Peter Jackson can't let go of romantic friendship. Baz Luhrmann can't let go of prostitution narratives. Sam Mendes is all about domestic horror. Whedon can't let go of rape, but I sure as hell don't know why -- the reasons could be reasonable or they could be revolting. All I know is that it reads to me like a preoccupation that shows up even when he doesn't mean it to.

Your post really highlighted this. Your examples are all excellent, but I'm sure there are a ton more if we begin to look at the monsters/stories/victims of the week. And of course there's the point that vampires are inherently tied up with all this, what with the violence and sex and penetration...

And that's all I've got right now. Am way too tired for this...
ext_412536: (oh spike [btvs])

[identity profile] thevera.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I mostly meant forgiving on a personal, not universal level.

And of course, Buffyverse makes the whole issue even more complicated with the concept of souls. Or, in a way, less complicated, since getting his soul back reforms Spike quickly and effectively, and the show obviously believes that soulless vampire=demon-like & bad, vampire with a soul=human-like & capable of good. (Which doesn't completely ring true to me, either - the way Spike was written it seems (again) a little more complicated than that.)

So, I pretty much agree with everything you wrote. :)

[identity profile] parallactic.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 10:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I always saw the feminism in BtVS as deliberate because of the many subversively feminist MotW eps, but I also think the show failed in several areas. I got the impression that it started to rest on its laurels and started to get sloppier instead of going deeper.

(Even if I do love her as her self-assured S7 incarnation.

I have a thing for HBICs, ice queens, and tightly wound characters so early Buffy is too well-adjusted to be my usual type.

Though I also wonder what it says that when Buffy does become the Final Girl - like in the Wish - she actually dies. Because that seems like an unnecessary corollary, and seems to me to say that female survival can only be shifted/inverted, rather than equally spread out... I might be too attached to Wishverse!Buffy.)

I figured that the mass slayer spell was the solution to spreading out the survival rate of girls. Since slayers were supposed to be "one girl in all the world" that meant they were alone, the exception, the token heroine. The Chinese slayer dies alone, Nikki Wood dies alone, Kendra dies alone, Wishverse!Buffy dies alone, Buffy dies twice and gets resurrected by her friends. ...And it would have been brilliant if slayer empowerment wasn't done through mystical rape. So yeah, I agree that the female empowerment metaphor was dodgy.

[identity profile] ohwaluvusbab.livejournal.com 2010-05-08 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that's exactly what [livejournal.com profile] shipperx said upthread. Maybe I should re-phrase myself: I have no idea why they would actually think that was a good idea.

[identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com 2010-05-09 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
On the subject of rape in the Buffyverse: I'm not sure of its fit with regard to patterns and context, but there's a few panels in IDW's "Spike: After the Fall" comics that to me are clearly a depiction of rape -- but not so to the comic's writer. It's the story arc in which Los Angeles has been sent to a hell dimension, and Spike is there protecting a group of humans and Illyria (who he believes is sharing the shell with a resurrected Fred.) He and his group are captured by the evil demon Non, who has Spike beaten up, chains him in a cell with the humans, and reduces the humans to living skeletons.

The behavior of Spider, one of Non's young female henchmen, is just as deplorable. Having taken a fancy to Spike, she "visits" him in the cell: crawls onto his lap, forces a kiss on his mouth, unzips his pants, and demands that he get an erection so that she can mount him. He's both drawn and written as showing disgust, and tries to kick her away. He asks her to help his suffering human companions, and she scoffs that they're dead already. He demands to know if Fred is all right, and Spider pouts, "Stop thinking about her! Think about ME!"

On IDW's message forums, I commented on how horrid I thought Spider was, and how I was glad that Spike was depicted as being revolted by her sexual molestation of him. I was floored when the author of that comic replied to me that it wasn't rape or molestation at all; that Spike enjoyed Spider's attentions and that he (the writer) thought that Spider would make a cute girlfriend for Spike. O_O

He seemed genuinely surprised that I found Spider and the scene offensive -- and he didn't answer when another poster later asked him to imagine the scene with the genders switched (Buffy chained and being forcibly mounted by a male demon, for instance.) I tried to explain to him that in my book, it doesn't matter how cool the guy is or how pretty the girl: if someone's making you have sex when you've made it clear that you don't want to be having sex, that's rape.

[identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com 2010-05-09 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
Which imho didn't work, because they'd spent too much of the season showing a depressed Buffy using, taking advantage and manipulating someone who loved her and didn't have the moral understanding to realize that what Buffy was doing was hurting her as well as himself.

I agree; that's why I came away from that bathroom scene thinking "Well, hell, he's only got an extremely crippled moral compass to guide him, and the sexual behavior she's demonstrated to him all season has led him to honestly believe that when she says 'no' she really means either 'yes' or 'seduce me into it'...why SHOULD he think that this time is any different?"

[identity profile] sarahlovesa.livejournal.com 2010-05-09 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
I have been reading through this whole discussion and there is a lot that has resonated with me. One thing that stood out was when you said It's the same thing that I felt while watching Dollhouse. All of it is one giant rape metaphor, and I was feeling completely overwhelmed and beleaguered watching it week after week. They recently started showing Dollhouse where I live and I was very excited to have another chance to enter a Jossworld. But after watching a few episodes I gave up. Watching it seemed somehow voyeuristic and made me uncomfortable. It just left a bad taste in my mouth because it seemed so misogynistic and that is not something I had really thought about in connection with Joss Whedon. He has written some amazingly strong women over the years and one of the strengths of BtVS was that it was centred around a petite blonde fragile looking girl who did NOT need to be saved by some hero, but could kick ass all by herself . Yet Dollhouse seems to be subverting the feminist polemic in subtle yet unmistakable ways. Maybe I should try to continue watching it, but I just don't enjoy it and I don't get what Joss was trying to do with it. Actually, reading this post has been quite shocking, because seeing everything put in a list is disturbing. I have always argued against those who dismiss BtVS as immature teenager fluff by saying that the show had a lot of important things to say, especially about the role of women in society. But seeing everything put together articulates my own ambivalent feelings about Joss Whedon's writing, which I am not sure I had even admitted to myself, as I love so much of his work.

[identity profile] fenchurche.livejournal.com 2010-05-09 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I was floored when the author of that comic replied to me that it wasn't rape or molestation at all; that Spike enjoyed Spider's attentions and that he (the writer) thought that Spider would make a cute girlfriend for Spike.

o_O

Seriously?!? Wow. I'm so glad I wasn't hanging on out on the comic forums then, because... wow. Although I guess it explains why we got subjected to Spider throughout the rest of the series. I thought that was pretty weird at the time.

[identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com 2010-05-09 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, BL was determined to pair Spike and Spider up as a couple, and it was only after a deluge of reader protests on his blog and at IDW that he finally gave up the idea. The protests weren't shipper-based -- there was no "Spike should be with Buffy-Dru-etc. instead!" -- they were simply people who found Spider repulsive due to her actions, and who thought it would be extremely out of character for Spike to want anything to do with such a person. Soon afterward, BL said in an interview that he'd wanted to make Spider a recurring character in his upcoming Spike series and that he wanted to convince all the readers to like her just as she was, but that due to so much negative feedback that plan would probably be changed. He sounded quite baffled and disappointed that no one liked her. On the IDW forums, he said that Spike deserved a sexy girlfriend like Spider who would worship him and be all over him and not care about anyone or anything else -- that that made her character interesting.

The whole thing was so bizarre, especially since his story simultaneously had Spike in a relationship with Fred that was tender and moving and at times even romantic, and not at all selfish or abusive. He portrayed Spike and Fred romantically to the point that Wes/Fred and Spike/Buffy fans got upset, then he'd deny on the forums that there was anything romantic about them. He portrayed an angry Spike being sexually assaulted by Spider, then he'd state on the forums that Spike enjoyed the Spider sex and was simply cranky and not in the mood during that one particular visit. Spider's horrific callousness toward the suffering humans around her would be pointed out to him, and he'd reply that she'd had a hard life and so we should give her a break.

So even after these awful Willingham and Williams arcs are done, I'm still not looking forward to any future AtS comic books at all. I wanted to see the TV gang back again: Cordy, Fred, Lorne, Spike, Angel, Wes, and Gunn. I wouldn't have minded Illyria a bit, if Fred had been allowed to be alive in the stories, too. I even hoped for Doyle to be resurrected. Instead, IDW keeps dropping those beloved core characters and replacing them with peripheral ones and with characters of their own creation. To me, it just doesn't feel like the Angelverse at all anymore, and I've never been so disappointed.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-05-10 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow.

Thank you so much for sharing this.

I have more to say about it, but I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate your bringing this to my attention and also speaking up about it other places. Thank you.

[identity profile] sockmonkeyhere.livejournal.com 2010-05-11 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
You're quite welcome! I wish I could draw comic book illustrations; I'd make my own AtS and BtVS comics and post them online, with a parallel universe/alternate reality theme. That way I could feature a different 'ship in each story, so that every fan, including the non-canon shippers, would eventually get to see his/her favorite couple(s) depicted at some point. AND THERE WOULD BE NO RAPES, MYSTICAL OR OTHERWISE. *flails*

Page 5 of 7