lirazel: An outdoor scene from the film Picnic at Hanging Rock ([misc] joss is boss)
lirazel ([personal profile] lirazel) wrote2010-04-11 06:37 pm

I have some thoughts about shipping

I've been writing this in bits and pieces over the last few days, and I've finally plugged in all the pieces, I think. It's not as thoughtful or well-constructed as I wish it was, but I'm going to throw this out there.

And no, this doesn't really have anything to do with the current flare-ups here in Buffy fandom that seem like they might explode into shipping wars at any moment. This is less an examination of one ship versus another and more a series of thoughts about shippers versus everyone else. Just as a disclaimer. Your ship will not be bashed within, no matter what it is.

I do identify as a shipper. In case you couldn't tell from my ship/quote meme a while back, I tend to get a little invested in romantic relationships in fiction. *ahem*

I also tend to get invested in platonic relationships. Don't get me started about Spike&Dawn or Veronica&Keith or the Doctor&Donna (UNTIL THE END OH DOCTOR I WILL NEVER FORGIVE YOU) or Adelle&Topher or various sitcom gangs (That 70s Show, How I Met Your Mother, COMMUNITY COMMUNITY COMMUNITY)--definitely don't get me started on sibling relationships: I will definitely go on for hours (the Summers girls! The Donnelly boys! The Tams! The Blacks! The Winchesters back before my epic break up with that show! I could go on and on and on!).

I'm a character-watcher. I love good worldbuilding as much as the next person, and I always appreciate a well-plotted story, and I will totally get picky about continuity...but it's characters that make me watch, that get me invested. I don't cry because something happens, I cry because something happens to a character I care about. I'm not filled with joy because of this turn of events, I'm filled with joy because this turn of events happens to a character I care about. As much as I hated Pamela, when it comes right down to it, in the battle between Richardson versus Fielding, I am Team Richardson all the way. CHARACTER FTW.

And a huge part of characters are relationships. Platonic or otherwise, we become different people depending on who we're with (I absolutely know there's a fantastic quote that I love that I should be using here, but I can't remember what it is!). I'm a different person with my mama than I am with the BFF than I am with my boss than I am with a stranger on the street. That's how it is to be human.

Sometimes when I'm watching a show, I really love what a particular relationship reveals about a given character, and so I'm very drawn to that particular relationship. I love the way Spike and Dawn bond over being outsiders, over being pretty immature, and later over their mutual grief, and I also love that she's totally unintimidated by him and that he really likes (and will protect) her for who she is. I love the way that Tommy Donnelly would do anything for his brothers (that show won me over absolutely when Tommy takes off to go kill someone and Kevin got in the elevator with him and Tommy goes, "Where're you going?" And Kevin just looks at him and goes, "Wherever you're going," like it's the most obvious thing in the world. YES). Community is a flail-fest for me, because they keep putting new characters in moments of interaction and it is always awesome and I flail.

But more people tend to be fannish over romantic ships than they do about platonic relationships. Sure, there are quite a lot of Spike&Dawn fans out there, and I recently discovered there are more Angel&Connor fans than I thought there were (yay!), and I don't think anyone who loves Veronica Mars doesn't have a soft-spot for Veronica&Keith. But they don't seem to prompt as many fanworks, as much fic, as many flaily posts or icons or what have you.

Perhaps this is just because fic in general seems skewed towards shipping and away from gen, whether that shipping is het or slash or femmslash or whatever. People like sex. (Even if I'm one of those people who gets bored by all the porn in fandom.) Perhaps, also, this is because so many fics are all about getting the two characters together, which is easier to write about in romantic relationships: there are clear road signs that we all understand--the first kiss, the first "I love you," the first fight, the first time having sex, etc.--that make it simply easier to write fic about.

So fannish cliques (I hesitate to use that word, but I can't think of another) tend to grow up around specific romantic ships, with the gaps often bridged by love of a common character (I'm thinking specifically of the fact that there are a ton of Spuffy fans who get along great with Spangel fans or Spander fans or Spike/anyone-at-all fans--that common love of Spike is enough, especially with a character that's polarizing in the larger fandom). We have loads of fun together because we can be sure that we're watching the similar shows and because we create works our friends want to consume. It's happy times for all! (Well. Most of the time.)

But then there's non-shippers relationships to shippers. This is something I'm running up against a lot lately, and it hasn't been pretty. Because there's a great deal of disdain from non-shippers towards shippers. As though anything a shipper says can be totally disregarded simply because that person is a shipper. This drives me crazy, but I've been seeing it a lot: the belief that if you identify as a shipper at all, anything you say is automatically worth nothing.

This reaction grows out of a false view of shippers, I think, which is that shipping is all we care about. I'm sure there are some shippers whose entire love of a given canon is based around one relationship. I've encountered a few of them, and even though that isn't my thing, I say to each their own and move on. But I really do believe that the majority of shippers aren't there just for the ships. They love many things about the canon, even if they tend to be fannish about ships.

For instance. With Community, I do ship Jeff/Annie because I love the idea of this really snarky, cynical guy finding this overachieving, naive girl irresistible (I ignore the age difference. Yes, I do). But if they don't ever become canon? I don't care. If the show ever shoots them down (which it won't: this show loves flirting with possible pairings it will probably never pursue further, which is one thing that's so hilarious about it), I'd be momentarily sad, but then I'd move on. Because there are so many more things I love about this show. I love Troy&Abed and Abed&Jeff and Jeff&Shirley and Shirley&Annie and Annie&Britta and Britta&Troy, etc, etc, etc. I love Senor Chang and the Dean and the jokes about Glee and the way it skewers college tropes. I love that it's so not ironic and is so fond of its own characters. I love that it's actually funny and--this is key--that the humor arises out of characterization.

I love all of that. That's why I watch. But yeah, I ship, too.

The fact that I do ship absolutely shouldn't mean that any of my opinions about the show are worthless. It shouldn't. But I feel like it often does.

This is annoying enough as it is, because the idea of one thing about you determining everyone's reaction to you is just sad (especiallyespeciallyespecially when it's something as mundane as your reaction to a television show). But there's something that takes it past being aggravating and right into being just plain ugly:

It's gendered.

If you don't believe me, see this post. [livejournal.com profile] ruuger pointed out in the comments that it's almost always gendered, which was something I hadn't gotten all riled up about, because it hadn't been that blatant to me, but I am now.

Does anybody remember this article (which I'm not linking directly to because I don't want to give them more page hits--I have no idea about this blog I'm linking to, but it's got to be better than this MRA group) about women "ruining" sci-fi? It was written by a Men's Rights group, which is enough to make a lot of people discredit it as misogynist rantings (which it totally is), but I think it's something to take seriously because I really do think it reflects the wider fandom-wide reactions to women in fandom.

Our culture is a misogynist one, and so any subculture within it, unless it specifically sets out to not be so, is going to be misogynist as well. Fandom certainly is. It's easy to forget that when we surround ourselves with other fic writers (who tend to be women, by a large majority) or staying here on lj, which is more of a safe space for women. But when you venture out, it sometimes smacks you in the face, as it did the other day in that post on whedonesque (which, don't read the whole thing. It got long and, eventually, stupid. I got dragged into arguments I shouldn't have that had nothing to do with anything, and now I'm sad that I did, because I don't think I argued persuasively, and the whole thing was just dumb. Anyways.).

It crops up again and again, abut everything in fandom, but especially about shipping: shipping is something only stupid, irrational women do (or, according to this guy, gay guys). Never mind the fact that this is patently untrue, as the guys who popped up in my post to say, "Um, hi! Straight-guy shipper here!" proved (love y'all!). It's also closely identified with hatred of Mary Sues and the idea of twelve-year-old girls being the lowest forms of human life. (A cultural trope which makes me stabby beyond belief. There are no words for how much that angers me. I love you, twelve-year-old girls of the universe! You are beautiful and wonderful and don't let anyone tell you otherwise!)

Also, I think specifically in the fandoms of the Buffyverse, there's been a lot of past ugliness involving shipping that really did have a profound affect on the larger fandom. Which isn't good, and the last thing I want to see happen is a revival of that sort of thing. But this idea has become so entrenched that shipper=stupid, destructive, etc. in this fandom.

If only the hysterical wimmenz (and gay guys!) would listen to the rational, big strong men, fandom would be pristine and wonderful. There's only one way to view/enjoy/react to a show/movie/book, and that's their way. Never mind the fact that they often have different ways--some privilege good plot construction, others are all about originality, etc.

This belief really is everywhere in fandom, at least as far as I can see.

Gah. I hate this. It makes me angry. And I feel like we need to start calling them out on it. Because I haven't before. That time? Was my first time to say, "No. This is not okay." I need to question this idea that shippers are all irrational and/or immature.

I need to say: "You don't have to care about John and Aeryn as much as I do [yes, yes, I'm watching Farscape for the first time; why do you ask?]: that's okay. But just because I care about them, that doesn't mean my opinion is worthless, and it doesn't mean that your way of watching the show is the only way. And it doesn't mean that women are stupid or irrational or immature or any of the other things that you're suggesting when you make snobby comments about shippers." I need to say that.

Yeah. So. That was much longer than I thought it would be. Any thoughts? Anybody want to tell me what it's like in other fandoms? I seem to remember this sort of thing being prevalent as well in my very first fandom (the only other one where I was really active in a place that wasn't either lj or fanfic sites), but I was young and hadn't really figured out the whole sexism thing. Is this more prevalent in Whedon fandom and is this because of the great Shipper Wars? Anyone?

[identity profile] shamoogity.livejournal.com 2010-04-11 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
*Slow clap* Yes! I especially relate to this:

Sometimes when I'm watching a show, I really love what a particular relationship reveals about a given character, and so I'm very drawn to that particular relationship.

That's definitely where shipping comes from for me and I don't see how that is some sort of inferior form of enjoyment. Do I understand people whose whole enjoyment of Battlestar revolves around the various models of spaceship? Not really, but I would never say that's not what they're supposed to be getting out of the show.

I definitely have this argument with my boyfriend fairly often, because we tend to enjoy the same shows, but come at them from different angles. And I do feel like he is often dismissive of shipping, and also of things like fanfic and fanvids. Whereas I think obviously any segment of fandom will have its crazies, but there is so much quality work and discussion out there too.

I do think shipping can be polarizing if people aren't mature about it. But it doesn't have to be! Maybe I just think this because I tend to see the potential in a lot of ships that aren't necessarily OTP. I think the best writing lends itself to the most ships eg. BtVS or Community.

Anyway, that was kind of a hodgepodge of thoughts, but to sum up: Well said.
next_to_normal: (badder than you)

[personal profile] next_to_normal 2010-04-12 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
love the way that Tommy Donnelly would do anything for his brothers (that show won me over absolutely when Tommy takes off to go kill someone and Kevin got in the elevator with him and Tommy goes, "Where're you going?" And Kevin just looks at him and goes, "Wherever you're going," like it's the most obvious thing in the world. YES).

OMG YOU'RE A BLACK DONNELLYS FAN WHY DID I NOT KNOW THAT?

As though anything a shipper says can be totally disregarded simply because that person is a shipper. This drives me crazy, but I've been seeing it a lot: the belief that if you identify as a shipper at all, anything you say is automatically worth nothing.

This drives me SO FAR up the wall. Although it's not just limited to non-shippers. I find that other shippers will dismiss you if you ship a different ship than theirs (especially if they are "warring ships" like Bangel and Spuffy). And the hypocrisy just baffles me, because it's like, I'm apparently incapable of thinking beyond my ship, but you, who are equally shippy, are totally rational and unbiased?

But yeah, I hear you on the gender bias thing. In my first fandom, Sliders, the women actually left the main message board and started their own board, because we were annoying the manly, rational men with our silly romantic fanfics when they wanted to talk about their SRS BSNS theories* (on Sliders! For reals, that show is 70% crack, and the science is 90% made up. Which makes your theory of parallel universes 110% bullshit). So we played happily in our fanfic playground - and a few guys came over to join us - and the main board was saved from the inane twaddle of silly wimminz.

*The funny thing is, the fandom at large basically had the equivalent of a shipper war, but it was fought over theories of parallel universes (god we are such dorks), where two (male) fans postulated their own contradicting theories, and the rest of fandom lined up behind the two of them and fought it out. It got pretty heated and people got banned. But then we had a war over berets, which was also gendered, but much more fun.

[identity profile] madcap-shiny.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
I love this post so hard.

I remember when the Children of Earth miniseries for Torchwood came out, and while I won't spoil you (because as you know I ardently believe you should see it!), a particular ship-related plot twist happened that INFURIATED most of fandom, and I won't lie, it really brought out a lot of the batshit crazy, to the point where RTD was getting death threats. And I don't blame him for being cranky about it. But then in an interview he said something about how it was all just "hysterical women on the Internet" and ooh! ARGH. IT MAKES MY TEETH ITCH JUST TO THINK ABOUT IT. It's just one way I've seen even showrunners attach the explanation of hysterical wimmenz to insane, irrational fan behavior. And, you know, they were also 'shippers, which explains everything. And I just feel so conflicted about it, because on the one hand: death threats. But on the other: OH NO HE DID NOT JUST SAY THAT.

And I don't know. It's just a particular example to me that's especially frustrating, because it's from someone whose stories I like to hear. The "'shippers (meaning women and gay men) are ruining scifi" thing makes my blood boil still, but at least at the end of the day I can just dismiss it as asshattery I shouldn't listen to. But hearing that from an actual writer who I usually support when everybody else flips out at him? I hate it. I hate it a lot. And knowing that it's not just RTD or some crappy misogynistic "men's rights" group, that it's such a general thing, is upsetting and troubling and angering and NYAR.

Ugh.

I just wish we could all be in the same playground and not push each other off the swings. OMG WHY IS THAT SO MUCH TO ASK.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
That's definitely where shipping comes from for me and I don't see how that is some sort of inferior form of enjoyment. Do I understand people whose whole enjoyment of Battlestar revolves around the various models of spaceship? Not really, but I would never say that's not what they're supposed to be getting out of the show.

Exactly.

I may be overreaching here, but perhaps part of the reason your boyfriend feels that way is the cultural idea that romance (and fanfic, and vidding) is for women, and that anything for women is lesser. It's hard to battle that sort of cultural brainwashing.

Whereas I think obviously any segment of fandom will have its crazies, but there is so much quality work and discussion out there too.
YES.

Absolutely it can be polarizing, but no, it doesn't have to be! I want to read back through my "Thoughts on why B/A won't work" post to make sure it didn't come across as defensive or combative, because I really wrote it in about fifteen minutes just to be silly. And I mean, I was serious about some of the reasons I didn't see them as working, but I don't want to come across--ever--as judgmental towards people who like them, because they're probably just looking for completely different things in a (fictional) relationship than I am AND THAT'S OKAY. Just to use that as an example.

Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it! And the post was a hodgepodge of thoughts, too, so the comment goes well with it.

*pulls out Mal/Inara icon*
deird1: Fred looking pretty and thoughful (Default)

[personal profile] deird1 2010-04-12 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
But then in an interview he said something about how it was all just "hysterical women on the Internet"

That made me want to SHOOT him. I think I was angry for almost a fortnight over that interview...



Awesome post, Lauren.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
HAHAHA. Because I don't talk about it much? I actually wrote a piece of BD fic! It's on my fic list! I wrote it a while ago, so I don't know if it's any good, but that show hit a lot of my kinks. Also, I once wrote a Buffy/Tommy ficlet. Trufax.

Although it's not just limited to non-shippers. I find that other shippers will dismiss you if you ship a different ship than theirs (especially if they are "warring ships" like Bangel and Spuffy). And the hypocrisy just baffles me, because it's like, I'm apparently incapable of thinking beyond my ship, but you, who are equally shippy, are totally rational and unbiased?

YES. OH YES. I see this a lot in people dismissing Spuffy fans as rape apologists (I'm sorry: have you met me? Or Gabs? Seriously? Feminism is what we do), which is just so hurtful. I'm sure it goes the other way, too, but that's the way I've seen it, and it's both ridiculous and infuriating.

Yeah, I feel like that sort of gender split ends up happening a lot. *sigh*


*The funny thing is, the fandom at large basically had the equivalent of a shipper war, but it was fought over theories of parallel universes (god we are such dorks), where two (male) fans postulated their own contradicting theories, and the rest of fandom lined up behind the two of them and fought it out. It got pretty heated and people got banned.
YES YES YES. They are just as capable of being irrational and destructive! Just because it isn't over romance doesn't mean a damn thing! And I love that you brought up that all the science was made up. That makes it even better!

But then we had a war over berets, which was also gendered, but much more fun. I love this lots!

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
YAY! *loves you so hard*

Actually, no need to step lightly: I already know what you're talking about. *is spoiled for everything ever before watching it* :D

Like you say, the death threats thing is ludicrous. But his reaction is AWFUL AWFUL AWFUL.


I just wish we could all be in the same playground and not push each other off the swings. OMG WHY IS THAT SO MUCH TO ASK.
YOU ARE A WOMAN AFTER MY OWN HEART.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
I do not blame you at all. It makes me furious, too.

Thank you! :D

[identity profile] gabrielleabelle.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
You know, ever since your post about the douchebag over at Whedonesque, I've been wanting to say something on this topic. But my thoughts hadn't settled and I didn't have anything formed.

So yay! You beat me to it! Word. *nods*

It's very frustrating to be dismissed off-hand by non-shippers (and, as Eowyn points out, by Bangel shippers) just because I happen to think Buffy and Spike are awesome cool. I mean...sheesh, that's not the only thing I like in the show. That's just one of my preferences. Among many.

But yes, the devaluation of romance, of liking romance while still being intelligent and forming logical arguments, etc etc. Makes me rage-y.

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:18 am (UTC)(link)


dear god yes. i'm just sitting here nodding along. i said this in [livejournal.com profile] angela_weber's journal last week and i'll repeat it here, though i was talking about lost and that fandom's anti-shippy... ness:

here's what people don't get about shipping, or at least about me and shipping. it is not simply limited to the fact that i love love and have always been fascinated by it even back when i thought it didn't exist. but the fact is - and this applies to all shows but particularly to lost in this context - the ships and love that characters have for each other is telling about the characters themselves and about the drive of the plot. i remember i was re-watching battlestar galactica and suddenly realized that at the end of the day, the thing that drove the story was not the robots or the Mythological Structure but love. from day one. it was about who loved who and why and what they were willing to do or give or sacrifice for that. it has always been that way. and that's what made it such a strong show, that the show said, yes, this is about robots and space and people killing each other, but it's very HUMAN and humans fall in love, sometimes when they shouldn't.

which, yeah. true story. when do we learn more about a CHARACTER than what they do when they're in love with someone? or, as i said in that same conversation, that's the way humans work, isn't it? isn't that how we do things? going from point a to g and hoping along the way someone will love us as much as we love them?

true life: i'm a shipper and i fucking love it.

also what there is going to be a fail war in the buffyverse fandom? YE GADS glad i ship the one no one likes so i can just ignore everyone else. ahhh.
Edited 2010-04-12 00:20 (UTC)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
Yay! You do it for me all the time, so I'm pleased to return the favor!

Exactly. And preferences about something like this definitely shouldn't undermine your worth as a fan.

But yes, the devaluation of romance, of liking romance while still being intelligent and forming logical arguments, etc etc. Makes me rage-y. It's so infuriating.

[identity profile] madcap-shiny.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
WELL OKAY THEN. Ianto Joooones, ack, it was almost worse than Wash

I KNOW. It's just, like, on the one hand I have no sympathy for the outrageous reaction to it, but on the other hand, RTD? YOUR WORDING LOSES FOREVER.

♥!

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Hahaha! Gif-win!

I like to make you nod! :D

[eta] the ships and love that characters have for each other is telling about the characters themselves and about the drive of the plot. YES!

when do we learn more about a CHARACTER than what they do when they're in love with someone? or, as i said in that same conversation, that's the way humans work, isn't it? isn't that how we do things? going from point a to g and hoping along the way someone will love us as much as we love them?
OH YES YES YES.

I'm so glad that you're as unabashed about your shipping as I am. Shipping is awesome.

Yeah, there are rumbles. I think the whole thing is going to explode, and I'm kind of petrified about it. I'm doing my best to stay far away from it. *sigh*

YOU WIN. Yes, that's what I've decided: BUFFY/RILEY FANS WIN. Because y'all aren't going to be involved in the stupid!

Also, because of the pretty, pretty icon!
Edited 2010-04-12 00:24 (UTC)

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Was it really worse than Wash? *is appalled*

It's just, like, on the one hand I have no sympathy for the outrageous reaction to it, but on the other hand, RTD? YOUR WORDING LOSES FOREVER. YES.

♥ back!
ext_7351: (αΩ | Φ | bang bang)

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_jems_/ 2010-04-12 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
I'm always so happy that fandom on LJ is female dominated because it means that even though we're not completely rid of the ridiculous mentality that 'shippers are lesser fans, at least non-'shippers usually think before they type up that comment. My experience from venturing elsewhere has shown me that that's not usually the case, so I tend to stick pretty close to home.

Platonic or otherwise, we become different people depending on who we're with
This right here? The entire reason I quit watching Supernatural after a season and change. The fact that it hadn't even occurred to the creator that it might behoove them to write some, at the very least, recurring female characters made me furious. Oh no, please disregard a whole gender, I'll keep watching anyway, the abs alone are worth it... *eyeroll* As if!

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
I USE THE GIF FOR ONLY THE MOST APPROPRIATE CORRECT MOMENTS. potus approves. that's the name of the file. true story.

I'm so glad that you're as unabashed about your shipping as I am. Shipping is awesome.

I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND BEING OTHERWISE. my entire life has always revolved around shipping. i don't think i've written a gen fic in my entire life. okay, i appear to have written one. true story. like -- people who don't ship. i don't understand it. it's just a natural reaction for me, it's what i enjoy - i like seeing people work through the dangers of figuring out another person, i like seeing people, inevitably walled people, try to break those walls down. i like seeing what people will do because they love someone.

my father and i watched bsg together while i was still at home, and it's like we watched totally different shows. he didn't even know kara and lee but by their call signs until i just kept calling them kara and lee for years and eventually he caught on. he's in it for the space wars and the battle between good and evil. but he also thought the cylons were all evil until, like, season four. so idek. tangent. but it's fascinating to me, people who simply don't ship. there's apparently a large contingent of these folks on my flist when it comes to the who fandom - WHICH I SO DON'T GET. i ship anything. it's a problem. but also it's awesome. even though it hurts like a bitch.

eep. scary. i like my buffy/riley land ty. :D

[identity profile] eilowyn.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
I WAS THINKING ABOUT DOING THE SAME META!!! We are in serious mind meld mode these days, I swear it! That meta (that I'm far too lazy to actually write - thank you so much for doing it for me!) arose because as the Ship War Alarm rises, people begin to discount anything very smart people say because of their ship affiliation. It was getting really obnoxious on the boards, where any possible objection to the comics was completely discounted because the person raising the objection was a silly, bitter Bander or Spuffy. People were doing close reading of the comics (something I can't do - I can't look at the comics too closely or I'll begin sporking my eyes), analyzing them with the knowledge of comic book tropes and the tendencies of Joss Whedon, the creator (and yes, the guy's got a bit of an M.O.), and really examining what was happening beyond the Bangel sexxorz - heavy, literary analysis stuff - and being completely and irrevocably ignored because of their alleged bias.

Yeah, we all have our ship goggles that we like to put on. I've recently discovered I'm blind as a bat when it comes to slash, but have become friends with diehard Spangels and Spanders because of a love of Spike (I've been PM'ing a Spred recently, and our love fest and mutual support is at the point where we could break into a chorus of "We Are The World" at any moment). This is the point you make that I've been noticing most in the recent flair up - the bad behavior and gloating of a certain faction unites the other factions - not necessarily against the first faction, but in mutual support of each other in spite of the other faction.

However, when ship affiliations lead to someone completely discounting what someone else says that is in no way ship related - that's when it enters the land of not cool.

[identity profile] author-by-night.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
For instance. With Community, I do ship Jeff/Annie because I love the idea of this really snarky, cynical guy finding this overachieving, naive girl irresistible (

I think they're both the reverse in some ways too. There's a naive side to Jeff, thinking that faking a study group was going to work with someone who was already clearly not that into him, and having been addicted to pills has to make you a tad cynical. So I think they'd work. And yeah, there's an age difference, but I think Annie's a lot less immature than she seems. Plus, Jeff seems to be more protective of Annie than even Britta, who he's supposed to have a crush on.

I love Troy&Abed

Who doesn't? :D But yes, I agree... in fact, I'd argue that the show doesn't even need to have romantic pairings. They've made the whole idea of tension and half truths and "how into me is (s)he really?!" questions work without it.


Perhaps this is just because fic in general seems skewed towards shipping and away from gen, whether that shipping is het or slash or femmslash or whatever. People like sex. (Even if I'm one of those people who gets bored by all the porn in fandom.) Perhaps, also, this is because so many fics are all about getting the two characters together, which is easier to write about in romantic relationships: there are clear road signs that we all understand--the first kiss, the first "I love you," the first fight, the first time having sex, etc.--that make it simply easier to write fic about.

See, I think that's the problem. People are baffled by the idea of there not being sex related storylines. Which is sad, because while yes, it's true that sex sells... people aren't stupid. They can understand things beyond that. They can also write things beyond that.

I'm very much big on gen relationships. Actually, most of my favorite Jossverse relationships are platonic. Willow, Xander and Buffy; Inara and Kaylee; River and Simon; Echo and Priya; Dawn and Tara.

As far as sexism goes, I think there is some in terms of female relationships. I was at the movies today and it occurred to me that a lot of times, the female friends of the heroine are fickle, ditzy, mean, and/or ugly comic relief. It's weird.

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
Hi, let's talk about Supernatural, because WORD but I just stopped watching after they killed off the last female characters standing. this weekend (I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS IS A TRUE STORY BUT IT IS TRUE) this girl was driving me back from work and she was all "you're a women's studies major, what are your thoughts on supernatural!" now, we had had this conversation about five months ago, but she didn't remember that, but i did because i was full of rawr!type rage. and i pointed out to her that i like strong female characters(™) and the show lacked them and then they killed off jo and we were done. and she was just like "WELL THERE'S JUST NO SPACE FOR WOMEN IN THE SHOW"

and basically i was caught up in a mix of



and



in a way that can only truly be explained by gifs.

/rant tyfyt. the supernatural fandom is horrid.

[identity profile] madcap-shiny.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I mean, for me there's not a whole lot that can beat the swift brutal no-goodbyes of Wash - that gets me in general; SCC did something similar in its second-to-last ep - so I don't know if it was quite worse, for me. But it was still pretty terrible. i mean slowly being gassed in your immortal lover's arms while you beg him not to forget you in a thousand years asdjfl;asl;;;;;

RTD has always presented himself as a guy who Doesn't Care What the Fans Think, to put it mildly, but. RARRGH. There are just lines to me, you know? I respect not pandering to what everybody wants and doing something controversial, but being a graceless jerkass about it is a line. And. Ick.

[identity profile] author-by-night.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
"WELL THERE'S JUST NO SPACE FOR WOMEN IN THE SHOW"


"You know Jensen Ackles isn't going to marry you anyway, right? And that Dean doesn't actually exist?"

^ That's what I want to say when I see comments like that. And I don't even watch the show.
Edited 2010-04-12 00:54 (UTC)

[identity profile] madcap-shiny.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
no space for women on the show
no space for women on the show
no space for women on the show
no space for women on the show
no space for women on the show
no space for women on the show




. . .i need to go scream into a pillow.

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
As far as sexism goes, I think there is some in terms of female relationships. I was at the movies today and it occurred to me that a lot of times, the female friends of the heroine are fickle, ditzy, mean, and/or ugly comic relief. It's weird.

have you heard about the bechdel test? words to live by.

[identity profile] anythingbutgrey.livejournal.com 2010-04-12 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
BELIEVE ME, I KNOW.
Edited 2010-04-12 00:55 (UTC)
snickfic: (Buffy close)

[personal profile] snickfic 2010-04-12 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
You are very smart.

That is all.

Page 1 of 4