Entry tags:
(no subject)
Warning: these thoughts are very preliminary and more coming from a place of instinct than well-formed thought. I am happy for anyone to push back against anything I say provided you do it respectfully.
Hannah and I were talking yesterday (in a very un-nuanced way) about how weird it is that within fandom circles, there are fewer and fewer people willing to engage in commenting/meta-writing/actual fannish conversation (or hell, even reblogging of art on Tumblr), but more and more people who think nothing of paying for online stuff? I am shocked that this ko-fi thing has taken off--I guess I'm old school enough that the thought of monetizing fandom is horrifying to me.
I mean, I guess there's an entire cohort of people who never used the internet before Facebook introduced the like button and so don't know the joy of full-on fannish engagement. And those same people are accepting the commodification of...everything.
It's just really, really weird to see. I know there was a gap in culture between the pre-internet 'zine-and-conventions fans and then the very first fans who were using the internet before the world wide web and then again my generation who started using it in the late 90s and came up on message boards and mailing lists and such. But the gap between those earlier generation of fans (and by generation, I'm very much talking about "when you got involved in fandom," not what age you are) and the current one seems like a chasm. I just don't recognize how they do fandom, and I am actually pretty sad that none of them seem to want to do it the way we do it (only, you know, with greater diversity, etc. I'm not pretending like the internet in 2001 was perfect. It was much whiter and richer, and lots of things about accessibility have changed for the better since then).
I've just always really loved that fandom is a gift economy and that the gifts go both ways. That I write fic because I want to share it with y'all, and y'all respond and engage with it, and we all have a great time together. A "content"-based view of fandom where you just ~consume~ is just so repugnant to me and I don't want anything to do with it, and I know we're not going back to a livejournal kind of fannish experience, but I'm just...really not looking forward to further changes in fandom. I don't see good developments coming down the road, and I can't figure out if this is me being all Old Man Yells at Clouds or if I'm right and things just aren't as fun anymore.
And yes, this is partially about me getting fewer comments when I write fic for a huge fandom than when I write for a Yuletide-sized fandom, but also it's about a general feeling that people just don't view fandom (or even the whole internet) as a place of two-way interaction anymore.
Hannah and I were talking yesterday (in a very un-nuanced way) about how weird it is that within fandom circles, there are fewer and fewer people willing to engage in commenting/meta-writing/actual fannish conversation (or hell, even reblogging of art on Tumblr), but more and more people who think nothing of paying for online stuff? I am shocked that this ko-fi thing has taken off--I guess I'm old school enough that the thought of monetizing fandom is horrifying to me.
I mean, I guess there's an entire cohort of people who never used the internet before Facebook introduced the like button and so don't know the joy of full-on fannish engagement. And those same people are accepting the commodification of...everything.
It's just really, really weird to see. I know there was a gap in culture between the pre-internet 'zine-and-conventions fans and then the very first fans who were using the internet before the world wide web and then again my generation who started using it in the late 90s and came up on message boards and mailing lists and such. But the gap between those earlier generation of fans (and by generation, I'm very much talking about "when you got involved in fandom," not what age you are) and the current one seems like a chasm. I just don't recognize how they do fandom, and I am actually pretty sad that none of them seem to want to do it the way we do it (only, you know, with greater diversity, etc. I'm not pretending like the internet in 2001 was perfect. It was much whiter and richer, and lots of things about accessibility have changed for the better since then).
I've just always really loved that fandom is a gift economy and that the gifts go both ways. That I write fic because I want to share it with y'all, and y'all respond and engage with it, and we all have a great time together. A "content"-based view of fandom where you just ~consume~ is just so repugnant to me and I don't want anything to do with it, and I know we're not going back to a livejournal kind of fannish experience, but I'm just...really not looking forward to further changes in fandom. I don't see good developments coming down the road, and I can't figure out if this is me being all Old Man Yells at Clouds or if I'm right and things just aren't as fun anymore.
And yes, this is partially about me getting fewer comments when I write fic for a huge fandom than when I write for a Yuletide-sized fandom, but also it's about a general feeling that people just don't view fandom (or even the whole internet) as a place of two-way interaction anymore.
no subject
But I do hope there is a schism - that if this takes over Tumblr or Pillowfort (it has a snowball's chance in hell of taking over places like DW), places for the fans like us emerge or persist in their space.
no subject
+ 1. This this this. (Though it baffles me, especially in its Tumblr permutation: the anonymous ask.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
For example: if you just look at the bookmarks on a story, it might say 200, and then when you click on the number, everyone who has it bookmarked is listed. But if you go into your stats and look at bookmarks, you might see that there are actually 400 bookmarks. You can't look at who, you just know that 200 people have it bookmarked it privately. Does that make sense?
no subject
However, since we are considering reasons, and since there are so many antis who love to harass other fans, I can see why someone might do a private bookmark if they didn't want to advertise they were reading a particular kink, or pairing that perhaps the fandom has decided are 'wrong.'
Also... correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the 'mark for later' just lump all the stories together? If one bookmarks something, there is the ability to organize by fandom or any other tags and then later search for specific criteria. Someone who has a lot of fic marked for later (maybe several fandoms) may find it more convenient to be able to sort and filter them.
Just my 2 cents.
no subject
Also... correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the 'mark for later' just lump all the stories together? If one bookmarks something, there is the ability to organize by fandom or any other tags and then later search for specific criteria. Someone who has a lot of fic marked for later (maybe several fandoms) may find it more convenient to be able to sort and filter them.
A very good point!
no subject
Out of curiosity: Why do you bookmark rather than "mark for later"? Is there an advantage to bookmarking?
no subject
no subject
no subject
ETA: I started using private bookmarks when people were saying that they use bookmarks as recommendations. I kind of just want to be able to mark things without having it be some huge thing that people make judgments about and as I said, if it's a private bookmark nobody's going to 'take it as a recommendation''
no subject
no subject
no subject
I took that experience to AO3 and I do the same thing, and it has served me well. That's just...how I find things that are worth my time on big sites. Find my favorites' favorites.
If there's a mark for later function and bookmark function (as there was when I started using the site so long ago), it seemed to me that one was for my personal use and one was for public use.
However, the recommendation function does complicate all of that, because now there are three ways to mark a fic. If you use the mark for later as it's intended to be used, and then you use the rec feature as it's intended to be used, then...what is just a regular bookmark with no rec for? It certainly becomes confusing!
Or maybe it's all purposefully designed to let people have multiple options for each different kind of "marking."
[eta] I'm getting the feeling that you're mad at me, and I'm not sure why? Did I imply that you shouldn't use the site the way you want to use it? If so, I apologize--that was not my intention and I should have written more carefully. I feel no judgment about it. It just honestly hadn't occurred to me until the past few weeks (when I saw a similar discussion on Tumblr) that people use it differently than I do. I was just trying to explain my reasoning.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
"I don't know how 'mark for later' works"
I guess the main advantage of "mark for later" over bookmarking to read later is that you can easily get a fic off your "mark for later" list by clicking "mark as read." And the fic will stay on your history page, even if you have taken it off your "mark for later" list. So it's an easy want to find specifically the stories you've marked to read later.
"but I don't really see an advantage to using 2 different functions."
Oh, I see! Thanks for explaining. I hadn't really thought about the advantages vs disadvantages of bookmarking to read later - I appreciate your mentioning this.
no subject
no subject
Oo, I can see how that would work well. Thanks for the insight!
no subject
I think you're right that this is more likely and probably more desirable. Those of us who feel some sort of through line with the heritage of western media fandom (I have always thought of those 60s housewife zine-writers as my fannish ancestors) can do different things, and the people who have only experienced the post-social media internet landscape can do their thing.
people like influencer culture and the commodification of hobbies. A lot of people say they don't, but: talk is cheap. Why do influencers stay influential? Because people opt-in to that space, keep watching their work, and sharing their work (even if to criticize it - which is also apparently a way of becoming an influencer).
You are correct. There are a bunch of people who unironically love the influencers; there are a bunch of people who hide their love behind "irony"; and then there are a bunch of people who really do hate-follow. I don't understand any of those things, really--the parasocial relationships I have tend to be with, like, podcasters (Sarah Marshall, Michael Hobbes, Audrey Gordon) or YouTubers (Lindsey Ellis, ContraPoints) whose whole schtick is being deeply thoughtful about cultural trends. Those are the people I'm drawn to, and I find more standard kinds of influencers actively off-putting. But I am in the minority, I think!
Anyway, that was far afield of the point, which is that I think your observations are all correct.
no subject
Those are the people I'm drawn to, and I find more standard kinds of influencers actively off-putting.
You and me both!
no subject